How many hypothetical particles do we need

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the need for hypothetical particles to enhance the standard model of particle physics, which currently includes six leptons, six quarks, and several force carrier particles. Key points include the necessity of a graviton for gravity theories and an unknown particle to address dark matter. The standard model does not account for gravity or dark matter, leaving significant gaps in our understanding. Current gravitational theories do not mandate a graviton, although quantized versions do. The conversation highlights the ongoing challenges in particle physics and the need for further discoveries.
wolram
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
4,410
Reaction score
555
How many as yet undiscovered particles do we need to make the standard model work?
 
Space news on Phys.org
Define "work".
 
Physicists have developed a theory called The standard model to explain how particles holds the universe together.
The standard model basically includes 6 leptons,6 quarks,Force carrier particles.
The quarks are classified as up,down,top,bottom,charm,strange.
The leptons are classified as electron,muon,tau,electron neutrino,muon neutrino,tau neutrino.
The force carriers include photons,gluons,W boson,Z boson.
 
wolram said:
The graviton is needed for our theories of gravity
Some as yet unknown particle is needed to make dark matter work.
etc.

graviton https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graviton
Axion https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Axion
etc.
But the standard model does not deal with gravity, nor does it deal with a solution to the dark matter problem. Since the are open problems, we have no idea what is required.

Also, current gravitational theories do not require a graviton. Quantisations of them do.
 
Abstract The Event Horizon Telescope (EHT) has significantly advanced our ability to study black holes, achieving unprecedented spatial resolution and revealing horizon-scale structures. Notably, these observations feature a distinctive dark shadow—primarily arising from faint jet emissions—surrounded by a bright photon ring. Anticipated upgrades of the EHT promise substantial improvements in dynamic range, enabling deeper exploration of low-background regions, particularly the inner shadow...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
Title: Can something exist without a cause? If the universe has a cause, what caused that cause? Post Content: Many theories suggest that everything must have a cause, but if that's true, then what caused the first cause? Does something need a cause to exist, or is it possible for existence to be uncaused? I’m exploring this from both a scientific and philosophical perspective and would love to hear insights from physics, cosmology, and philosophy. Are there any theories that explain this?
Back
Top