How many M type stars equal the luminosity of one O type star?

  • Thread starter Thread starter blumfeld0
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Luminosity
AI Thread Summary
To determine how many 0.75 solar mass main sequence stars equal the luminosity of one 3 solar mass O-type star, the mass-luminosity relation can be used, expressed as L/Lsun proportional to (M/Msun) raised to the power of 3.5. O-type stars are significantly brighter than M-type stars, with the luminosity difference being substantial. The discussion suggests using resources like astronomy notes and lecture materials for additional information. It is important to consider that variations in stellar composition, such as helium and metal content, can affect luminosity calculations. Understanding these factors is crucial for accurate comparisons between different star types.
blumfeld0
Messages
146
Reaction score
0
Hello. what equation do i use to figure out how many .75*Msolar main sequence stars would it take to equal the luminosity of one 3*Msolar O tpe star?
I know O type are much brighter but how many times brighter?

thank you
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
blumfeld0 said:
Hello. what equation do i use to figure out how many .75*Msolar main sequence stars would it take to equal the luminosity of one 3*Msolar O tpe star?
I know O type are much brighter but how many times brighter?

thank you
You ought to be able to get most of this info from links starting on http://www.astronomynotes.com/starprop/chindex.htm" .

or http://www.astro.caltech.edu/~kbundy/ay1page/lectures/class7.pdf".
 
Last edited by a moderator:
blumfeld0 said:
Hello. what equation do i use to figure out how many .75*Msolar main sequence stars would it take to equal the luminosity of one 3*Msolar O tpe star?
I know O type are much brighter but how many times brighter?

I would use a table, but if you can't find one, the mass-luminosity relation should be fine:

\frac{L}{L_{sun}} \propto (\frac{M}{M_{sun}})^{3.5}
 
SpaceTiger said:
I would use a table, but if you can't find one, the mass-luminosity relation should be fine:

\frac{L}{L_{sun}} \propto (\frac{M}{M_{sun}})^{3.5}


As a side note this requires that composition (hydrogen, helium, metal mass fractions) be the same. Higher helium content will mean higher luminosity as will lower metal content.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top