How many other atoms is the central atom bonded to ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter butterwings
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Atom Atoms
AI Thread Summary
In the discussion about the molecule ICl3, it is clarified that the central atom has 2 lone pairs of electrons. The correct number of atoms bonded to the central atom is 3, not 5, as there are only four atoms total in the compound. The molecular geometry is determined to be T-shaped due to the presence of the electron pairs occupying equatorial positions. The electron-pair geometry is also discussed, indicating that the arrangement is influenced by VSEPR theory. Overall, the analysis emphasizes the importance of understanding molecular structure and geometry in chemistry.
butterwings
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement

For the molecule ICl3

I) How many lone pairs of electrons are on the central atom?

II) How many other atoms is the central atom bonded to ?

III) What is the molecular geometry of the molecule?

IV) What is the electron-pair geometry?
a) triangular planar b) tetrahedral

c) triangular pyramidal d) octahedral

e) triangular bipyramidal f) linear

g) angular h) square planar

i) see-saw j) T shaped

k) square pyramid

Homework Equations



No formula needed.

The Attempt at a Solution


I want to know if I am correct: or anyone will agree that
Correct Answers?
I. 2
II. 5
III. e
IV. j

Thank you!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
butterwings said:
For the molecule ICl3
Ugh, ICl3 doesn't exist as a monomer (maybe in the gas phase). But let's play along...

butterwings said:
I) How many lone pairs of electrons are on the central atom?
7 valence electrons, 3 tied up in covalent bonds leaves 4 electrons (2 lone pairs).

butterwings said:
II) How many other atoms is the central atom bonded to ?
Not sure how you got 5, since there's only 4 atoms in the whole compound. The correct answer is 3.

butterwings said:
III) What is the molecular geometry of the molecule?
Again, triangular bipyramidal assumes 5 atoms around the central atom. In our case, we have 3 atoms and 2 electron pairs. So including the electron pairs, triangular bipyramidal is a good place to start. But since you only have 3 atoms, 2 of the equatorial spots are occupied by the electron pairs. This leaves the remaining 3 atoms in a T-shaped configuration, as predicted by VSEPR theory.

butterwings said:
IV) What is the electron-pair geometry?
Again, according to VSEPR theory, the electron pairs will be oriented at an angle to one another.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top