How Many Stars Can Detectable Wobbles Reveal Extrasolar Planets?

AI Thread Summary
Extrasolar planets can be detected through the wobble they induce on their host stars, with calculations based on the masses and orbital radii of the star and planet. For a Sun-like star with a Jupiter-like planet, the radius of the star's orbit around the center of mass is approximately 8.58E8 meters. Astronomers can detect angular displacements of about 1 milliarcsecond, allowing for the detection of wobbles from stars up to 37 light-years away. Assuming uniform star distribution, it is estimated that around 800 stars within this distance can be studied for extrasolar planetary systems. Current advancements, such as data from the Gaia mission, are expected to significantly increase the number of detectable planets.
nick21324neo
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Description: An extrasolar planet can be detected by observing the wobble it produces on the star around which it revolves. Suppose an extrasolar planet of mass revolves around its star of mass . If no external force acts on this simple two-object system, then its CM is stationary. Assume and are in circular orbits with radii and about the system's CM.

A) Find radius of the star's orbit about the system's CM. (answered)

ra= (mb)(rb)/ma

B)Now consider a Sun-like star and a single planet with the same characteristics as Jupiter. That is, and the planet has an orbital radius of 7.8×1011 . Determine the radius of the star's orbit about the system's CM. (answered)

*used formula above: ra=8.58E8

C)When viewed from Earth, the distant system appears to wobble over a distance of . If astronomers are able to detect angular displacements of about 1 milliarcsec (1/3600 of a degree), from what distance d (in light-years = 9.46E15) can the star's wobble be detected ? (answered)

d = 37 lightyears; I found the answer by using the ArcLength formula:

Arclength=Radius of Arc*theta

D) The star nearest to our Sun is about 4 lightyears away. Assuming stars are uniformly distributed throughout our region of the Milky Way Galaxy, about how many stars can this technique be applied to in the search for extrasolar planetary systems?

Attempt for part D): I attempt this problem by using basic geometry

I determined the circumference by using the the distance of 4 light year and divided it by 2ra

The answer is found: 1.4E8 stars which is wrong. What am I doing wrong? It just seems to be a lot of stars.

Thanks
 
Last edited:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
An exact calculation will be more complicated but for a reasonable approximation we can assume that the star density is 1 star within the volume of up to 4 light years distance (4/3 pi (4 ly)3). We don't have to calculate that volume, just the r3 dependence is important: Up to 37 light years we have (37/4)3 = 791 times the volume. We expect about 800 stars with a distance of up to 37 light years.

Gaia is currently taking data, it will detect wobbles of the order of 0.1 milliarcseconds. It is expected to find thousands to tens of thousands of planets that way.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top