How Many Strawberries and Ice Cubes Does Monet Need for His Smoothies?

  • Thread starter Thread starter hellothere1
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Monet, a graduate student, spends his entire weekly salary of $10 on strawberries and ice for smoothies, requiring 10 strawberries and 5 ice cubes per smoothie. With strawberries priced at $0.5 each and ice cubes at $0.2, he can buy 20 strawberries and 50 ice cubes with his budget. To determine how many smoothies he can make, he needs to calculate the total number of strawberries and ice cubes he can purchase within his budget constraints. The economic intuition behind the indifference curve reflects his preference for balancing the quantities of strawberries and ice to maximize his smoothie enjoyment. Ultimately, Monet can make two smoothies with his available resources.
hellothere1
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



"Monet is a first year graduate student and he receives a weekly salary from his teaching assistant job on campus. His stress–release activity is to make strawberry smoothies. Therefore he spends all his weekly salary for buying strawberries and ice. In order to make a perfect smoothie, he needs to put 10 strawberries and 5 cubes of ice per cup of smoothie. The price of a strawberry is $0.5 and the price of a cube of ice is $0.2. His weekly salary is $10."

b. Draw one of Monet’s indifference curves for strawberries and ice and explain the economic intuition. (I think I got this one)

c. How many strawberries and ice cubes will Monet buy? Show the answer either graphically or mathematically. (please help here)

Homework Equations



Y(income)= Price of ice * ice + price of strawberries * strawberries

The Attempt at a Solution



10 = ? omg help

the intercepts will be 20 and 50
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To make n smoothies, how many strawberries and how many ice cubes does Monet need?
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top