How much Academic Knowledge is used in industry?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion highlights that specific academic knowledge learned in graduate school is often not directly applicable in industry roles, with a greater emphasis on practical skills and the ability to conduct background research. While developing technical depth in a subject is beneficial, the likelihood of securing a job directly related to that specialization is low. Participants agree that a well-rounded education is crucial for success in various fields, as it enhances overall technical skills and critical thinking. The conversation underscores the importance of learning as much as possible during academic training, even if that knowledge may not be directly utilized in the workplace. Ultimately, a strong foundation in academic subjects can still provide valuable insights and skills applicable across different industries.
thE3nigma
Messages
64
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone, and happy holidays.

I had a question that recently popped into my head as I am in my last three semesters of my undergraduate university. Some background, I am thinking of applying for a professional Masters degree (2 yrs long) before finding work in industry.

But I was wondering, how much of the information (not the tools or techniques in lab/calculations), but the actual knowledge of science (ex. how we take courses that focus on certain aspects of cell biology) will be important and used in industry. I have heard from quite a few people that most of the time, when your given projects you will have to do background research and some of the information we study in school is not that important in a real life scenario other than for students in traditional Masters/PhD.

So my question basically is if I should try to learn everything now in as much detail as possible or only what I am given to study? I know it may be a weird question, but I thought we could discuss it.

Again Happy Holidays everyone.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The likelihood of you using the specific knowledge you learn in grad school in the job market is very small. This is just the nature of grad school. You are supposed to learn one topic in detail. This is even more true of PhD than Master's level work. The odds of you being hired to do that specific topic are small.

However, this should not stop you from trying to learn as much as possible about your chosen topic. Why is this? I think that http://www.av8n.com/physics/breadth-depth.htm" has done a better job than me of explaining why, so I think you should read what he has to say. If you do not, I will summarize.

Developing technical depth is a great benefit. Depth in anyone subject can be helpful in understanding other technical fields. If you do not develop this early, it is harder to do later. However, you also need to spend time in college becoming well-educated. This is important in enabling you to develop technical skills in other areas, as well as becoming successful in life.

Spend time becoming an expert, but don't be upset when you can't find a job in that area. It will still be useful.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ben Espen said:
Developing technical depth is a great benefit. Depth in anyone subject can be helpful in understanding other technical fields. If you do not develop this early, it is harder to do later. However, you also need to spend time in college becoming well-educated. This is important in enabling you to develop technical skills in other areas, as well as becoming successful in life.

Spend time becoming an expert, but don't be upset when you can't find a job in that area. It will still be useful.

I read the article, and like you summarized he does mention that it would be hard; because the student wold not have the previous experience as to how to approach in depth studies. I guess this does connect back to my original post, where it seems that technical skills in how to research background information and in-depth information are more important in the applied industry.

Although, I agree that any field can be in some way beneficial to other fields. Even if it is just the thinking process a person develops from one course (ie. Organic Chemistry or Physics).
 
I don't know if anyone on here works for any of the well known defense companies of your country, whichever country you are from?? Also, if you choose to work in one, do you think the engineering education provide from your school would adequately prepare you for the job. What do I mean by that? Well if you work at say Lockheed Martin and you work in the latest iteration of a missile or if you work at Pratt & Whitney, they assign you to work in the team helping out with building the jet...
Hello, I graduated from undergrad a few years ago with a Major in Physics and minor in Electrical Engineering. I tried to get experience working on and testing circuits through my professor who studied Neutrinos, however covid caused the opportunity to go away and I graduated with no experience or internships. I have attempted to break into the engineering industry with no success. Right now I am considering going for a Masters in Electrical Engineering and I need advice on if this would be...
So lately, my interest in the realm of optics/optoelectronics/photonics engineering has grown and I have started to seriously consider pursuing a career in the field. I have done a bit of career research and also have done some learning on the side to gather more knowledge on these topics. However, I have some questions on what a career in these fields would look like, and I wanted to find out more about this area to know what I would be getting myself into if I did make the choice to pursue...

Similar threads

Replies
37
Views
9K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Back
Top