How Much Energy Does a Battery Supply to Charge Parallel Capacitors?

  • Thread starter Thread starter physgrl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Capacitors Energy
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the energy supplied by a 9.0 V battery to charge two parallel capacitors of 10 μF each. The correct energy stored in the capacitors is identified as 8.1 x 10^-4 J, while the energy supplied by the battery is calculated to be 1.62 x 10^-3 J. It is noted that the initial potential across the capacitor is zero, which affects the work done during charging. The conversation highlights the ambiguity in the question, suggesting it could be better worded to avoid confusion. Ultimately, the distinction between the energy stored and the energy supplied is crucial for understanding the problem.
physgrl
Messages
138
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Two capacitors having values of 10 μF each are connected in parallel and then hooked up to a 9.0 V battery. How much energy must the battery supply to charge the capacitors?

*a. 8.1 x 10-4 J
b. 9.0 x 10-5 J
c. 1.6 x 10-3 J
d. 2.0 x 10-4 J
e. 2.3 x 10-5 J


Homework Equations



ε=ΔW/ΔQ
Q=CV
ΔW=ΔE
C=C1+C2...+Cn (for capacitors in parallel)

The Attempt at a Solution



ΔE=ε*ΔQ
ΔE=ε*CV
ΔE=9V*(10μF+10μF)*9V
ΔE=1.62x10-3 J

the answer key says A is correct...can someone tell my why?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your calculation made the assumption that the change in potential is the same for all the charges moved onto the capacitor. When an initially uncharged capacitor is connected to a voltage source for charging up, the potential across the capacitor is not immediately equal to that of the source; the capacitor begins with 0V across it which rises to meet the source's potential as current flows and its charge increases.

What this means is that it takes less work to move charge onto the capacitor early on in the process when the capacitor potential is low than it does later when the potential is higher. If you perform the required integration to calculate the work you'll find that the resulting expression is similar in form to other such expressions for other types of energy. This can make it easier to remember them all! Some examples:

Spring potential Energy: PE = (1/2)kx2
Linear Kinetic Energy: KE = (1/2)mv2
Rotational Kinetic Energy: KE = (1/2)Iω2
Capacitor Electrical PE: PE = (1/2)CV2
 
You had an almostidentical question to this a couple of weeks ago. See the first post on the list at the bottom.
There are 2 important pieces of information
1) The energy STORED on the capacitor is (a) 8.1 x 10^-4 J
2) The energy supplied by the battery is (c) 1.62 x 10^-3 J
Whichever answer you take to be correct depends on your interpretation of the question.
For me, this means it is a badly worded question. A multiple choice question must have only one correct answer with no doubt whatsoever.
 
OK...thanks to the both of you!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top