How Much Energy Is Required to Change an Orbiting Body's Radius?

  • Thread starter Thread starter assaftolko
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity
AI Thread Summary
To change an orbiting body's radius from R1 to R2, two energy adjustments are necessary: first, to increase the potential energy (PE) to the desired height, and second, to adjust the kinetic energy (KE) for the new orbital speed. The calculation involves determining the energy difference between the initial and final states, taking into account the changes in both PE and KE. The discussion highlights the importance of the Vis-viva equation and Hohmann transfer orbits for understanding these energy changes. It is clarified that the KE at the end of the first step cannot be assumed to be the same as in the original orbit. Understanding these principles is crucial for accurately calculating the energy required for orbital adjustments.
assaftolko
Messages
171
Reaction score
0
A body with a mass of m is orbiting the Earth with orbiting radius of R1. We want to move the body so it will orbit the Earth with orbiting radius of R2. To achieve this we need to do 2 steps:

1. We need to give the body energy so it will reach the maximal distance from Earth which is exactly equal to the orbit radius we want to achieve.
2. We need to give the body energy at this maximal distance so it could achieve the appropriate speed that will alow it to orbit the Earth at such radius.

How much energy do we need to give the body in each one of the steps?

The orbits are circular.

I have no idea how to do this... I thought maybe to calculate the energy of m when it orbits the Earth with radius R1, and then calculate m's energy when it's at R2 for step 1 - and the difference between them is the answer. But what's the speed of m at the end of the first step? it's of course not the orbiting speed of circular orbit with radius R2...
 

Attachments

  • Ex 9.jpg
    Ex 9.jpg
    22.2 KB · Views: 447
Physics news on Phys.org
Part one is about changing PE, part two about changing KE.

At the beginning it has PE and KE. After step one PE is changed but it still has same KE. Do you actually need to know how the speed has changed?
 
You may want to check your references for the "Vis-viva equation" and "Hohmann transfer orbit".
 
CWatters said:
Part one is about changing PE, part two about changing KE.

At the beginning it has PE and KE. After step one PE is changed but it still has same KE. Do you actually need to know how the speed has changed?

As you can see the answers are at the bottom of the picture I uploaded and they do not work out with your way:

Step 1 = \frac{1}{2}GmEm[\frac{R2-R1}{R1(R2+R1)}]

I don't think you can say the KE at the end of step 1 is the same KE as when m orbits the Earth in R1 radius. This KE is the result of a specific orbit velocity that corresponds to the specific circular orbit radius of R1.
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top