How Much Energy Is Required to Launch and Escape a Satellite from Earth's Orbit?

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the total energy needed to place a 2,000 kg satellite into a circular orbit at an altitude of 500 km, gravitational potential energy and kinetic energy must be considered. The initial calculations yield a work of placement (Wpl) of approximately 0.9087 x 10^10 J. For the second question regarding the energy required to escape Earth's gravitational field, the binding energy concept is relevant, as it determines the additional energy needed once the satellite is in orbit. The discussion emphasizes the importance of accounting for both gravitational potential energy and the initial speed gained from Earth's rotation during launch. Understanding these energy dynamics is crucial for accurate satellite placement and escape calculations.
Lolagoeslala
Messages
217
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



9. What is the total energy needed to place a 2.0 x 10^3-kg satellite into circular Earth
orbit at an altitude of 5.0 x10^2 km?

10. How much additional energy would have to be supplied to the satellite in question 9
once it was in orbit, to allow it to escape from Earth’s gravitational field?

The Attempt at a Solution



9. I was trying to use the equation

Wpl = (- GMem/Ro) - (-GMem/Re)
Wpl = ( - (6.67 x10^-11 Nm^2/s^2)(5.98 x10^24)(2 x 10^3 kg)/(5 x10^5m)+(6.38 x10^6m)) - (- (6.67 x10^-11 Nm^2/s^2)(5.98 x10^24)(2 x 10^3 kg)/6.38 x10^6m))

Wpl = - 11.59494186 x 10^10 + 12.50363636 x10^10
Wpl = 0.908717 x 10^10 J

IS THIS CORRECT?

and what can i do for Question 10 ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Placing a satellite in orbit requires not only that you move it up to the required distance in the Earth's gravitational field, but also that you impart the required speed for it to orbit (otherwise it would just fall straight back down). So there's gravitational PE involved as well as KE.

One point that's not covered in the problem statement is whether or not you can take advantage of the initial speed of satellite due to it being launched from the surface of a rotating Earth; If you launch from the equator in the appropriate direction, you begin with an initial speed due to the Earth's daily rotation.
 
gneill said:
Placing a satellite in orbit requires not only that you move it up to the required distance in the Earth's gravitational field, but also that you impart the required speed for it to orbit (otherwise it would just fall straight back down). So there's gravitational PE involved as well as KE.

One point that's not covered in the problem statement is whether or not you can take advantage of the initial speed of satellite due to it being launched from the surface of a rotating Earth; If you launch from the equator in the appropriate direction, you begin with an initial speed due to the Earth's daily rotation.

ok so ... i am guessing you use the work of placement to find the speed?
 
Lolagoeslala said:
ok so ... i am guessing you use the work of placement to find the speed?
No, the work of placement is what you're trying to determine. How fast does a satellite in circular orbit at radius r have to be traveling to stay there?
 
haruspex said:
No, the work of placement is what you're trying to determine. How fast does a satellite in circular orbit at radius r have to be traveling to stay there?

yes that's for number 9 .. you are completely right about that;... but for the number 10 .. second question you are finding the binding energy correct?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top