How Much Energy Must a Cosmic Ray Have to Trace Back to Its Origin?

AI Thread Summary
To determine the minimum energy a cosmic ray must have to trace back to its origin, it must be deflected by less than 1° while traveling 1 kpc in a Galactic magnetic field of B = 1μG. The Larmor radius (rL) is crucial in this calculation, as it relates to the particle's trajectory and deflection. The confusion arises from the dual concepts of "pointing back" and the angle of deflection, which are linked through geometry. The problem emphasizes that higher energy results in less deflection, making the apparent origin of the cosmic ray closer to its true source. Understanding the relationship between rL and the angle of deflection is essential for solving this problem in the context of astrophysics.
SHISHKABOB
Messages
539
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Calculate the minimum energy of a cosmic ray that it needs to have in order to "point" back to its origin. Let's define this as being deflected by the Galactic magnetic field of B = 1μG by less than 1°, as it traverses a distance of d = 1 kpc within the Galaxy. Calculate this for a proton and an iron nucleus.


Homework Equations



rL = E/qB


The Attempt at a Solution



so it's a pretty straightforward question, but where I've hit trouble is trying to figure out the larmor radius.

The original vector of the particle is a line tangent to a circle with radius rl. Would the 1 kpc be the arc length along that circle that the particle travels along? If so, then I should be able to use some geometry to relate the angle that the particle is deflected to the larmor radius, right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
SHISHKABOB said:
Calculate the minimum energy of a cosmic ray that it needs to have in order to "point" back to its origin. Let's define this as being deflected by the Galactic magnetic field of B = 1μG by less than 1°, as it traverses a distance of d = 1 kpc within the Galaxy.

The statement is confusing. On the one hand, it talks about "pointing back". On the other hand, "being deflected less than 1 degree". What does that really mean?
 
the cosmic ray particle is deflected from its original path by some magnetic field so that it forms part of a circle with radius rL, the larmor radius

so by comparing the original path with the deflected path, you can find the angle between them. The question is asking for some minimum energy to cause this larmor radius. By looking at the cosmic ray, we see it coming from its deflected path, but really it came from some other direction and was deflected by a magnetic field. If the energy is high enough, then the deflection will be minor and so the direction that it appears to come from will be similar to the direction that it really came from.

Basically, I just need to figure out the relationship between rL and the angle theta in this drawing:

deflection_zpsbf1a888f.png


but I'm stumped by the geometry :(
 
So I guess we can ignore the part on "pointing back". I interpret this thusly: the particle goes through an arc of a certain circle, the length of the arc given, and the vectors of the initial and final velocity are within one degree. Does this help in any way?
 
yes, I think I've figured it out

and yeah, the "pointing back" part is just there to tie the problem back to observational astrophysics, because the class is an astronomy class
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top