How much energy would voyager sat. need to transmit data from pluto?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the hypothetical scenario of a Voyager satellite transmitting data from Pluto. It clarifies that once radio waves are generated, they continue to travel through space even if the transmitter is turned off, similar to how light propagates. The effectiveness of the transmission depends on the type of antenna used, with directional antennas providing better efficiency. Additionally, faint signals from deep space can still be detected by Earth-based antennas. The conversation also mentions the SETI project as a way for individuals to engage in listening for radio signals from space.
david90
Messages
311
Reaction score
2
if it transmits and shuts off its transmitter, would the signal still be traveling towards earth?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I don't have a precise answer for your title question, however to give you some feel for how much energy (in terms of effective radiated power) is transmitted from space probes. Here is a good reference discussing http://pdf.aiaa.org/preview/1968/PV1968_1103.pdf , using the Mariner satellite (1969 flyby to Mars) as an example.

I would assume your question is hypothetical since "both http://voyager.jpl.nasa.gov/faq.html flew beyond the orbit of Pluto/Neptune in 1989. Neither flew by Pluto, which was elsewhere in its orbit at the time. It was never planned that the Voyagers would visit Pluto."

If one of the Voyager sats were in the neighborhood of Pluto, then if it transmits and shuts off its transmitter, would the signal still be traveling towards earth? It would be reasonable to assume, this is the type of transmission made, since leaving the transmitter on after sending the data would be wasteful of power budgeted on a probe.

Once radio waves are generated, they will propagate across space (for the same reason that light will radiate across the universe even when its stellar origin has long since been extinguished). It does not matter that the transmitter is turned off afterwards, the energy radiates through space. I don't know what type of antenna they had on board the Voyager probes.Its efficiency would be improved if it was transmitted, using a directional antenna pointed at Earth (This ties in with the concept of effective radiated power). But even an omnidirectional antenna will radiate some signal towards earth.

Depending on the gain of earth-based antennas, some very faint radio signals can be discerned, not only from the edge of our solar system, but from deep space. A fun way you can assist in listening for intelligent radio signals from deep space is with the SETI project. You can analyze data collected from the Arecibo Radio Observatory on your home PC. (I've been participating since 2000).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top