How much information is too much at once?

  • Thread starter Thread starter themadquark
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Information
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the challenges of managing multiple learning subjects, including math, modern physics, and coding languages. The original poster expresses concern about the stress of absorbing too much information at once, despite retaining it well. Participants emphasize that the capacity to learn varies significantly among individuals, suggesting that while there may be a limit to how much information one can take in, the threshold is subjective and influenced by personal aptitude and the nature of the material. The conversation highlights the importance of consistent practice and the subjective nature of learning capacity, indicating that what may be overwhelming for one person could be manageable for another.
themadquark
Messages
22
Reaction score
1
Hello, I am currently attempting to improve my math skills, understanding of modern physics, and extend my knowledge of two "coding" languages. One thing that has been at the back of my mind, and has been quite bothersome lately is that I am taking in too much at once. While I haven't been forgetting much information at all, in fact less than most people, it still remains a stress. This brings me to my question -- is studying this much at once, not necessarily all in one day, but varied days throughout a week too much to handle and remember? Or am I fine as long as I consistently practice and attempt to use the new information I have taken in?
EDIT: I ask this here as I hope somewhat that somebody could provide a neuroscientific or psychological answer.
 
Biology news on Phys.org
You are asking for an objective answer to a question that only has a subjective answer. If it is too much for you, then it is too much for you. If not, then not.
 
phinds said:
You are asking for an objective answer to a question that only has a subjective answer. If it is too much for you, then it is too much for you. If not, then not.
Are you saying that there is no limit for how much you can learn at once and it depends on the person?
 
adjacent said:
Are you saying that there is no limit for how much you can learn at once and it depends on the person?

No, I would think that there has to be a limit to how much information can be taken in by that person in the world who is absolutely the most able (even if only by a trivial increase over the next-most-able) to take in information.

What I AM saying is that the amount of information that can be taken in (not even considering retention) will vary from person to person and they amount of information that can MEANINGFULLY be taken in will vary from person to person, and there would not necessarily be a 1 to 1 correspondence between the two..

SO ... I consider that question to require a subjective answer since the OP asked it about himself
 
also depends on what information the person is taking in, some people have a stronger aptitude for math, others for visual images, others sound.
 
Mordred said:
also depends on what information the person is taking in, some people have a stronger aptitude for math, others for visual images, others sound.

A very good point.
 
Deadly cattle screwworm parasite found in US patient. What to know. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/health/2025/08/25/new-world-screwworm-human-case/85813010007/ Exclusive: U.S. confirms nation's first travel-associated human screwworm case connected to Central American outbreak https://www.reuters.com/business/environment/us-confirms-nations-first-travel-associated-human-screwworm-case-connected-2025-08-25/...
Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S. According to articles in the Los Angeles Times, "Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S.", and "Kissing bugs bring deadly disease to California". LA Times requires a subscription. Related article -...
I am reading Nicholas Wade's book A Troublesome Inheritance. Please let's not make this thread a critique about the merits or demerits of the book. This thread is my attempt to understanding the evidence that Natural Selection in the human genome was recent and regional. On Page 103 of A Troublesome Inheritance, Wade writes the following: "The regional nature of selection was first made evident in a genomewide scan undertaken by Jonathan Pritchard, a population geneticist at the...
Back
Top