How much less wind resistance will a round skyscraper have?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Batmoosemike
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Resistance Wind
AI Thread Summary
A round skyscraper, modeled as a generic elliptical shape, is expected to have less wind resistance compared to a rectangular one, primarily due to its streamlined design. However, the main concern with such shapes is vortex shedding, which can lead to structural instability. While the drag coefficient may be lower for rounded forms, they may also produce unintended lift if wind does not align with the building's symmetry. This could pose challenges in various wind conditions, making it essential to consider these factors in the design proposal. Overall, while round skyscrapers may offer aerodynamic benefits, their performance in diverse wind scenarios must be carefully evaluated.
Batmoosemike
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
For a school project, I need to know how much less wind resistance a round skyscraper will have compared to a standard rectangular one. You can assume the skyscraper will simply be a generic elliptical shape, somewhat similar to an egg. Answer doesn't have to be extremely specific, I just need an average to put into my presentation.

We need to make a proposal talking about the benefits of round skyscrapers vs standard, rectangular ones.

Any help would be appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Batmoosemike said:
a generic elliptical shape, somewhat similar to an egg.
There is a significant disadvantage to using an elliptical shape instead of a circular one. Can you think of what that might be? It should be mentioned in your presentation... :smile:
 
berkeman said:
There is a significant disadvantage to using an elliptical shape instead of a circular one. Can you think of what that might be? It should be mentioned in your presentation... :smile:
I really can't think of what you're referring to. Could you please explain?
 
Batmoosemike said:
You can assume the skyscraper will simply be a generic elliptical shape, somewhat similar to an egg
Is the wind always coming from the same direction? Your shape might have less drag, but could produce significant lift perpendicular to the wind, if the wind is not perfectly aligned with the symmetry axis.
 
Batmoosemike said:
I really can't think of what you're referring to. Could you please explain?
See A.T.'s reply above this one, and also think about what happens at all given wind directions...
 
Susskind (in The Theoretical Minimum, volume 1, pages 203-205) writes the Lagrangian for the magnetic field as ##L=\frac m 2(\dot x^2+\dot y^2 + \dot z^2)+ \frac e c (\dot x A_x +\dot y A_y +\dot z A_z)## and then calculates ##\dot p_x =ma_x + \frac e c \frac d {dt} A_x=ma_x + \frac e c(\frac {\partial A_x} {\partial x}\dot x + \frac {\partial A_x} {\partial y}\dot y + \frac {\partial A_x} {\partial z}\dot z)##. I have problems with the last step. I might have written ##\frac {dA_x} {dt}...
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (Second part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8. I want to understand some issues more correctly. It's a little bit difficult to understand now. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. In the page 196, in the first paragraph, the author argues as follows ...
Back
Top