How Much Mass Converts to Energy in a Nuclear Plant Over a Month?

  • Thread starter Thread starter chef99
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Mass
AI Thread Summary
A nuclear power plant generating 3.0 x 10^9 W converts approximately 86.4 grams of mass into energy over a month. The energy produced is calculated using the formula E = P * t, resulting in 7.776 x 10^15 J. The mass-energy equivalence formula, E = mc^2, is then used to find the mass converted. The discussion clarifies that a Watt is a measure of power, defined as Joules per second, which supports the calculations. Overall, the calculations and assumptions made regarding the time frame for energy production are confirmed as correct.
chef99
Messages
75
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


A nuclear power generating station generates 3.0 x109 W of power. How much mass does the plant convert into energy each month (30 days)? Assume that the process is 100% efficient[/B]

Homework Equations



E = mc2

EJ = (Pw)( ts)

The Attempt at a Solution



First determine the amount of energy in joules, converting from watts.
There are 2.592 x106s in 30 days.

EJ = Pw + ts

EJ = (3.0 x109 w)(2.592 x106s)

EJ = 7.776 x1015 J

Now solve for the mass to energy conversion

E = mc2

m = E / c2

m = 7.776 x1015 J / (3.0 x108)2

m = 0.0864 kg

m = 86.4 g

86.4 g of mass was converted into energy in 30 days.I know the amount of mass needed for large amounts of energy, but this seems to be a very small amount. The one thing I'm not sure about is the conversion from watts to joules, as my course didn't provide a specific equation to do this. All of the questions I've done have been in joules already. The other thing is I did these calculations assuming the 3.0 x109 Watts of power produced is over 30 days, as the question doesn't specify over what period that energy is produced. I used 30 days as that was the only timeframe given for any of the measurements. I don't know if this is the correct assumption to make or not. I would really appreciate it if someone could take a look at this, specifically the watts to joules conversion. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi chef99,

Your work looks correct. Lots of energy is tied up in very little mass.

A Watt is a unit of power, the rate at which energy is expended (or absorbed). It is in fact a composite unit, comprising energy and time:

##W = \frac{Joule}{sec}##

So you can see how multiplying the Watts by the amount of time will give you the total energy produced over that period of time.
 
gneill said:
Hi chef99,

Your work looks correct. Lots of energy is tied up in very little mass.

A Watt is a unit of power, the rate at which energy is expended (or absorbed). It is in fact a composite unit, comprising energy and time:

##W = \frac{Joule}{sec}##

So you can see how multiplying the Watts by the amount of time will give you the total energy produced over that period of time.

Ok thank you for your help.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top