How Much Mechanical Stress Can an Antimatter Drive's Loop Handle?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the mechanical stress an antimatter drive's superconducting wire loop can endure, particularly one with a radius of 70 meters and a wire thickness of approximately 20 cm. The author estimates that generating a magnetic field of 10 Tesla at the center of the loop would exert over 7 giganewtons of stress, potentially exceeding the limits of carbon nanotubes. They also mention that only a fraction of the gamma rays from the antimatter reaction would contribute to heating the loop, with a projected 10 gigawatts of heat transfer. The calculations suggest that achieving a speed of 10% of light would require a year of full power operation, highlighting the complexities and challenges of antimatter propulsion. The discussion concludes with a note on the significant challenges associated with antimatter technology.
nehorlavazapal
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
I can't go into detail right know - but the thing is: in order to make a real antimatter engine one would need to make a loop of SCs wire r = 70 m, where r(wire) is approx. 20 cm.

I need to generate about 10 T in the center of the field, that is 70 m from the nearest wire. How much mechanical stress is this going to put onto the loop? I suspect that it will be more than even carbon nanotubes can handle, but a number would be handy, still.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Or to put it another way, if the loop was made out of best CNTs, it would take 7 GN of stress, so how strong magnetic field would it generate 70m away, down in the center.

This loop would intercept only 1/350 of resulting gamma rays out of the antimatter reaction, as. antiprotons, only 1/1000th of total engine output would heat the engine (disregard. any induced heating..? does anyone see any induction heating possible in large scale)? So, at 10 TW only 10 GW of heat would transfer to the 80 ton loop (assuming CNTs are SCs). I can take care of this heat, but need high field in the reaction core, to get thrust out of the antimatter reaction.

Assuming realistic efficiency, I would get 1 TJ of motion energy transfer to the ship. 0.5 × 80 000 × (3×10^7)2 = 3,6×10^19 J =

A year at full power to just get the loop to 10 % of the speed of light! Not counting the 8 tons of antimatter fuel neede, though plus the rest of the ship!

Antimatter is slow and more challenging than you think!
 
Last edited:
Thread closed for Moderation...
 
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Scalar and vector potentials in Coulomb gauge Assume Coulomb gauge so that $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A}=0.\tag{1}$$ The scalar potential ##\phi## is described by Poisson's equation $$\nabla^2 \phi = -\frac{\rho}{\varepsilon_0}\tag{2}$$ which has the instantaneous general solution given by $$\phi(\mathbf{r},t)=\frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\int \frac{\rho(\mathbf{r}',t)}{|\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}'|}d^3r'.\tag{3}$$ In Coulomb gauge the vector potential ##\mathbf{A}## is given by...
Dear all, in an encounter of an infamous claim by Gerlich and Tscheuschner that the Greenhouse effect is inconsistent with the 2nd law of thermodynamics I came to a simple thought experiment which I wanted to share with you to check my understanding and brush up my knowledge. The thought experiment I tried to calculate through is as follows. I have a sphere (1) with radius ##r##, acting like a black body at a temperature of exactly ##T_1 = 500 K##. With Stefan-Boltzmann you can calculate...
Back
Top