How much physics & EE for computational neuroscience?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the necessity of physics and electrical engineering (EE) knowledge in computational neuroscience. Participants highlight that circuit analysis is crucial for modeling single neurons, suggesting a foundational understanding of EE is beneficial. The conversation also touches on the relevance of physics, particularly concepts like Fick's law of diffusion, in the field. A one-year introductory physics course may suffice for basic understanding, but more advanced topics such as electrodynamics and thermal/statistical physics could be advantageous. Recommendations for textbooks in physics and EE tailored to computational neuroscience are sought. Additionally, the integration of experimental techniques like dynamic clamping is noted as a significant area that merges computational methods with practical applications, allowing for real-time simulations and manipulations of neuronal behavior.
DreCate
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
So there seems to have been many posts about how much math is required for computational neuroscience, but I don't know if anyone has raised the question of how much physics&EE is required for this field. It seems like circuit analysis is used quite extensively in modeling single neurons, but how much EE is actually needed to understand the literature? As for physics, I've seen something like Fick's law of diffusion appearing in some comp neuro and cellular physiology textbooks, but I don't know overall how much physics background is needed. So is a one-year college-level introductory physics adequate? Or is it necessary to study physics at a more advanced level (like a semester of electrodynamics and thermal/statistical physics)? Also, what textbooks would you recommend for physics&EE for comp neuro? Any advice is much appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I can't say much as I'm still an undergrad as well, but I did take a Neurophysiology class last semester. I don't know about computational neuroscience but neurophysiology certainly makes use of plenty of EE and physics. The professor teaching the class was a neurophysiologist with an EE background so it may differ. The neuro concepts are pretty basic: diffusion relations, concentration gradients, etc but things have to be measured somehow. Current clamping and voltage clamping can be done in different ways with different circuit configurations that can get very complex. Also, look into dynamic clamping if you haven't heard of that. It is a fascinating subject at the moment and a great way to combine the computational side of things with the experimental. The idea is to hook the cell up to a computer and have the computer "insert" (virtually) ion channels into the cell by injecting the appropriate currents in real time. You can even run a simulation model through the cell.
 
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...

Similar threads

Back
Top