How Much Power Is Dissipated in Each Resistor in a Multiloop Circuit?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cisneros778
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Power Resistors
AI Thread Summary
In a multiloop circuit with resistors R1 (32 Ω), R2 (45 Ω), and R3 (60 Ω), the power dissipated in each resistor can be determined using loop and junction laws. The discussion clarifies that the direction of traversal in applying loop law does not need to be consistent across different loops; respecting potential drops and rises is sufficient. If the direction is reversed in one loop, the equations will simply be multiplied by -1. It is suggested to analyze the outer loop for simplicity, reducing the chance of errors. The participant successfully solved the problem after this clarification.
Cisneros778
Messages
48
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


26-p-063-alt.gif


Three resistors, R1 = 32 Ω, R2 = 45 Ω, and R3 = 60 Ω, are connected in a multiloop circuit, as shown in the figure. Determine the amount of power dissipated in the three resistors.

Homework Equations



loop law
junction law

The Attempt at a Solution



(1) i1 +i2 +i3 = 0

(2) 9 - 45 i2 + 32 i1 = 0

(3) 15 +60 i3 + 9 - 45 i2 = 0

when you use the loop law, don't you have to go the same direction with every loop?
In the equation (3) it is going clockwise, and in equation (2) it is going counter-clockwise.
Is this wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You don't have to go the same direction with every loop. All you have to do is respect the potential drops/rises as specified by the chosen current directions (as indicated by the arrows) as you traverse the components during your "tour" around the loop.
 
Hi Cisneros778! :smile:
Cisneros778 said:
when you use the loop law, don't you have to go the same direction with every loop?
In the equation (3) it is going clockwise, and in equation (2) it is going counter-clockwise.
Is this wrong?

No, it doesn't matter which way round you go …

if you went the other way round one loop, everything would be multiplied by -1, wouldn't it? :wink:

btw, it might be easier to take the outside loop rather than the bottom loop (the outside loop is the sum of the other two), since it has one less term in it (and one less chance of making a mistake! :biggrin:)​
 
Thank you so much. I got the answers correct!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top