Thanks for the responses, everyone! I see there's quite a bit of variability in the answers, and most people seem to fit into the 6 - 10 hours category, with some still going over that or doing less.
Klockan3 said:
I went to the lectures, that's about it. There is of course always this nagging feeling that you should do more but you learn to live with it, mindless book grinding isn't fun nor productive in my opinion.
So my follow-up question would first be to those doing less work. How are you managing as far as grades are concerned? Did you make a conscious decision not to study more than that, do you not care about grades that much or are you more of an outlier compared to your peers, in the sense that you get things so much faster? I guess this ties in with Klockan3's post ...
And also, what about those of you who are studying 10+ hours? Do you just enjoy the material that much? Or did you, again, make a conscious choice you're just going to grind it through the university, and reap the rewards, if they come, later? Because the latter is something I'm leaning towards, but it seems that throughout my first studies and work life, I had the same mindset, and I'm kind of scared my life will be over before that "later" will come if I'm always going to be doing that. Also, how do you then cope with not having time for anything else besides Physics? I mean, don't get me wrong, I switched careers, because I think I want to be doing Physics for the rest of my life, but it's not
all I want to be doing. And that's an honest answer, I think. I could fool myself into saying that I like it so much I don't care if I have time for other stuff, but I do have stuff I like to do, and don't want to go through life putting everything off.
cristo said:
If you're working that much, then you can at least afford to give yourself the weekend off. University's meant to be fun, and you should certainly try and get a good balance between work and play.
So I guess as far as your reply is concerned, I always think of giving myself time off, but with so much work to be done, it seems I can't afford to. I can barely stay on top of the readings and all, and even losing a whole day would put me too far behind, and make catching up an even more anxious time.
On the other hand, there's this short story I quite like and ties in greatly with what I think you're trying to say. Once there was a guy trying to topple over a tree using a saw. The tree was large and thick, and as he was sawing for a long time, his saw was quickly losing sharpness. So he found it hard to saw through the trunk, but still continued without pause. Another guy comes by and plainly asks him why he doesn't take a break, sharpen his saw, and then continue. And the guy doing the sawing replied that he can't, because he just has no time to stop and skip a beat. So rationalizing things, I should do what you're suggesting, but I can't seem to be able to do it, because then I feel I'm going to be quite angry with myself for not giving it my everything, shoudl I not get the expected marks.
DrummingAtom said:
Oh no, I've been meaning to ask about this. This is a good description of what's been happening with me. On the exams I nail all the problem questions but get most of the concept questions wrong. I felt like it's ok because most people seem the opposite but lately it's been bugging me. The general consensus seemed that from doing enough problems you'd understand the concepts, but the kids that don't do any problems understand the concepts. So, how do you understand both?
This is exactly why I think reading theory is more useful than doing problems. I mean, sure, you need both, but if it's one or the other, I think theory wins every time. Because if you master it, you master practice or at least give yourself a chance to do so, but it doesn't work the other way. It was kind of similar when I was in law school, we never wrote suits or other legal documents, and we were all kind of puzzled by that, since even the secretaries in law firms could write simple legal letter and such. But one of the professors assured us that knowing the material and theory, you'll learn all of this stuff within a month of working, but that secretary won't be able to do stuff other than those simple things and will be quite puzzled herself when a small detail will be different to what she is used to. And when I was working, I found that to be true, and knowing the stuff, you're not phazed by small differences between practical examples, but if you only do those, then you usually won't be able to accommodate for them.
Obis said:
Also a good solution is to change the subject you're reading about, let's say, every 30 minutes : 30 minutes of mathematics, 30 minutes of physics, and then 30 minutes of.. Philosophy?
Yeah, that's true, although 30 minutes might be on the short side. But I do like taking courses in Maths, Physics, Computing Science (programming in Java), and Astronomy, as they offer different approaches to the study material, so it doesn't get boring as fast.