How Much Torque Is Needed to Stop Rotating Balls in 6.97 Seconds?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Leeoku
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass
AI Thread Summary
To determine the torque needed to stop two rotating balls connected by a rod, the calculation involves understanding angular speed and acceleration. The initial angular speed is given as 24.2 rpm, which converts to an angular acceleration of 2.53 rad/s². The correct torque is calculated using the moment of inertia and angular acceleration, resulting in a value of 10.3 N*m. The center of mass must be accurately determined, as it affects the torque calculation; the position along the rod can be found using the masses of the balls. Proper notation is crucial, distinguishing between angular speed and angular acceleration for clarity in calculations.
Leeoku
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 3.15 kg ball and a 6.30 kg ball are connected by a 1.31 m long rigid, massless rod. The rod is rotating clockwise about its center of mass at 24.2 rpm. What torque will bring the balls to a halt in 6.97 s?
Answer: 1.31e+00 N*m


Homework Equations


torque = I*alpha


The Attempt at a Solution


Alpha = 24.2*2pi/60
= 2.53
Torque = I*alpha
= 2.53(3.15*(1.31/2)^2+6.3(1.31/2)^2)
= 10.3

Ok so i think my process is right but my Centre of mass is probably wrong. is this because of the different weighting of both sides? Now i know Centre of mass = mr^2, but how do know how far each contributes?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are mixing things up a bit.

In your first equation you use alpha to signify angular speed, but in the second equation it signifies time rate change of angular speed, that is, angular acceleration. Following the usual notation you should probably use omega for angular speed in the first equation and then alpha for angular acceleration. You also need one more equation that makes the kinematic relationship between omega and alpha as a function of time.

You are correct that your center of mass is wrong. From definition of the CM you need to find the position along the rod, xcm, where m1(xcm-x1) + m2(xcm-x2) = 0 with x values being distances with sign along the rod from some reference point. For instance, choosing the m1 end of the rod as reference you have x1 = 0 and x2 = length of rod and you can easily solve for xcm.
 
The centre of mass is where the rod would balance perfectly on the point of a pin. To achieve this the torques on each side must be equal. Torque = Force x Distance. So the distance to one of the balls (from the centre of mass), multipled by that weight, must equal the distance to the other ball (from the centre of mass), multiplied by that weight. Then remember those two distances must add up to the full length of the rod. Hope that helps.
 
got it! thanks for the explanation on CM
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
21
Views
262
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
6K
Replies
31
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top