How Much Warmer Is Water at the Bottom of Niagara Falls?

  • Thread starter Thread starter blackflub
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Impossible
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the temperature increase of water at the bottom of Niagara Falls compared to the top, given a height drop of 50.6 meters. The final calculated temperature difference is approximately 0.118 degrees Celsius, derived from energy conservation principles. The conversation touches on the conversion of potential energy to kinetic energy during the fall and how this energy ultimately transforms into heat upon impact. The specific heat capacity of water, noted as 4187 J/(kg.K), is referenced for the calculations. Overall, the thread highlights the interplay of thermal and potential energy in this scenario.
blackflub
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
i can't even figure out where to start with this one

The water going over Niagara Falls drops 50.6 m. How much warmer is the water at the bottom of the falls thatn it is at the top? Disregard any possible effects of evaporation of water during the fall.

any help would be appreciated and the final answer is .118 C
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Energy is conserved:

\Deltathermal + \Deltapotential = 0

mc \Delta T + mgh = 0

Factor out the m

(4187) \Delta T + (9.8)(-50.6) = 0

\Delta T = 0.1184
 
thanx soo much i guess i thought it was soo hard that i believed myself
 
the unsettling thing is, what about the kinetic energy?
 
What kinetic energy? The water as it falls, increases speed (so kinetic energy also) as it loses potential energy. However, when it hits the bottom, it stops going down! There will be some small motion of water but it will be so turbulent that eventually it will be converted to heat. In the long run all the energy is converted to heat.
 
where did u get 4187?
 
joehoy41 said:
where did u get 4187?

The c term, the specific heat capacity of water in J/(kg.K).

BTW, this thread is nearly 8 years old!
 
Back
Top