How much will the aluminum wire stretch under a 3.57 kg load?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Schu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Stretch
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the stretch of an aluminum wire under a 3.57 kg load. Using Young's Modulus for aluminum, participants derived the formula for stretch, leading to a correct result of approximately 0.4 mm. One user initially calculated an implausible stretch of 2572 m, prompting a review of their calculations. After reevaluating the inputs and formula rearrangement, the accurate stretch was confirmed to be around 3.88 mm. The conversation emphasizes careful unit management and verification of calculations in physics problems.
Schu
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
How much will the aluminum stretch

a 3.57 kg mass is supported by an aluminum wire with a length of 2.43 m and a diameter of 2.01mm. How much will the wire stretch?
Young's Modolus for Al= 6.9 * 10^10

First get the cross sectional area of the Al

then plug it into the formula
Y = Fl/A(delta)l

I come out with like 2572 m which just doesn't seem right. Where am I going wrong? I have checked the math and averything is in m and kg.
HELP​
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I found a result of 3.8830...10^-4m~.4mm.
delta(l)=(F*l)/(A*Y) with a force of mg=3.57kg(9.8m/s^2)=34.986N*m--->
F*l=34.986*2.43=85.01598 and A*Y=pi*((2.01/2)*10^-3)^2)(m^2)*(6.9*10^10)*(N/m^2)=218943.0113.. N ---->
delta(l)=85.01598N*m/218943.0113...N=3.8830...*10^-4m~.4mm
--->delta(l)~.4mm. I think you made a mistake somewhere,check everything again.
 
You see I also made a mistake in the units, when I wrote mg=34.986N*m, I think that we should be more careful.

wisky40
 
Schu said:
Y = Fl/A(delta)l
Nothing wrong with this formula, but you'll have to rearrange it to find \Delta L:
\Delta L = \frac {L F}{Y A}
I come out with like 2572 m which just doesn't seem right. Where am I going wrong? I have checked the math and averything is in m and kg.
I'm glad you realize that your answer doesn't make sense. The only thing to do is to show exactly what numbers you plugged in, so we can check for an error.

wisky40's answer of about 0.4 mm is correct.
 
I went through it again after rearranging the formula, I'm not sure why I got what I did before but I came out with about 3.88 mm

THanks for the help.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top