How Much Work Does a Child Do Pulling a Toboggan Up a Hill?

  • Thread starter Thread starter x86
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics Work
AI Thread Summary
A 25.6 kg child pulls a 4.81 kg toboggan up a 27.3 m incline at 25.7 degrees, with negligible friction. The initial calculations for work done yielded incorrect results due to a misunderstanding of gravitational components and the use of sine versus cosine. The correct approach involves using gravitational potential energy to find work, resulting in approximately 1,284 joules. The discussion highlights the importance of distinguishing between kinetic and potential energy when calculating work. Ultimately, work can be equated to changes in energy, including both kinetic and potential forms.
x86
Gold Member
Messages
256
Reaction score
18

Homework Statement


A 25.6 kg child pulls a 4.81kg toboggan up a hill inclined at 25.7 degrees to the horizontal. The vertical height of the hill is 27.3 m. Friction is negligible.

Determine the amount of work the child must do on the toboggan to pull it at a constant velocity up the hill.


Homework Equations


W = F * D


The Attempt at a Solution


ag = gravity component of acceleration
ap = acceleration applied

ag - ap = 0
ag = 9.81 m/s^2 * cos(25.7 deg) = 8.8 m/s/s

F = 8.8 m/s/s * 4.81 kg = 42.5 N

W = F * D = 42.5 N * (27.3 m / (sin(25.8 deg)) = 2 665.82513 joules

This answer is completely wrong. The book got 1.3 * 10 ^ 3 J.

Not sure what I can do, I thought about setting W = Eg2 - Eg1. But I remember my teacher said that only works for kinetic energy (honestly, sometimes I think she doesn't know what she's talking about. It should work for gravitational energy too)

But if I do that,

W = 4.8 kg * 9.8 m/s^2 * 27.3 m I get the right answer which is 1 284.192 joules

This is confusing for me. Shouldn't I have gotten the same answers for both questions? How come my answers are different? Does it have something to do with vectors? Does work only count in one direction in this case (vertical), shouldn't the work done be how I calculated it in step 1?

More importantly, can I set W = change in energy, even if that energy is NOT kinetic?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Both methods would work. Your math is off in the first one, though: It should be sin(25.7°), not cos(25.7°). You're looking for the parallel part of ag, not the perpindicular part.
 
More importantly, can I set W = change in energy, even if that energy is NOT kinetic?
you may have misunderstood your teacher. The TOTAL work done by ALL forces is equal to the change in kinetic energy. This includes work done by conservative forces (like gravity) and non conservative forces (like applied forces). The work done by only nonconservative forces is equal to the change in kinetic plus potential energy.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top