How Much Work is Done to Change the Circular Path's Radius?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the work done to change the radius of a block sliding in a circular path on a table. Participants emphasize the importance of conservation laws, particularly energy and momentum, in analyzing the situation. There is confusion about whether energy is conserved as the radius decreases, with some arguing that the system must be clearly defined to make such determinations. The work-energy theorem is suggested as a potential approach to understand the energy changes involved. Overall, the conversation highlights the complexities of applying conservation principles in dynamic systems.
thedark_master
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
https://chip.physics.purdue.edu/protected/IEalgebraMimg/uiuc101-09-block.ie/pic.gif

A small block of mass 0.91 kg slides without friction on a horizontal table. Initially it moves in a circle of radius r0 = 0.63 m with a speed 1.5 m/s. It is held in its path by a string that passes through a small hole at the center of the circle. The string is then pulled down a distance of r0 - r1 = 0.12 m, leaving it at a radius of r1 = 0.51 m. It is pulled so slowly that the object continues to move in a circle of continually decreasing radius.

How much work was done by the force to change the radius from 0.63 m to 0.51 m?


basically i am completely lost, any help would be appreciated
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, you know that two things are always conserved, energy and momentum. A conservation theorem may be a good place to start.
 
ya i am still stuck
 
First get a sense of what is happening. The ball is going around in a circle with a constant velocity. Some kind of force is keeping the ball from simply shooting outward. The whole time, energy will be conserved. Now, as the ball moves towards the center by whatever force, is energy still conserved?
 
no its not
 
Id start by looking at the work energy theorem.
 
You don't believe that energy is still conserved? What would it lose energy to?
 
Well, one can't make a statement about energy conservation until the system is defined.
 
robb_ said:
Well, one can't make a statement about energy conservation until the system is defined.

Not really sure what you mean by this, but the system is defined enough to tell whether or not non-conservative forces are at play, and whether or not the work energy theorem can be used.
 
  • #10
You and I may have a system in mind where energy is conserved, but the OP may not, i.e. just the rotating block?
 
Back
Top