How Old Is the Wood Sample Based on Carbon-14 Decay?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the age of a wood sample using carbon-14 decay principles. The half-life of carbon-14 is established as 5730 years, and the decay rate is independent of external factors. A wood sample from an archaeological site underwent 7.90x10^3 disintegrations, while a modern sample underwent 1.84x10^4 disintegrations in the same time frame. Participants clarify that the ratio of disintegrations should be used to calculate the age, leading to the application of the decay equations. The conversation emphasizes the importance of using the correct values for the initial and final activities in the calculations.
plexus0208
Messages
49
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Background info: The first order rate of nuclear decay of an isotope depends only upon the isotope, not its chemical form or temperature. The half-life for decay of carbon-14 is 5730 years. Assume that the amount of C-14 present in the atmosphere as CO2 and therefore in a living organism has been constant for the last 50,000 years. An ancient sample containing C-14 will show fewer disintegrations of the C-14 that is present than a modern sample because the concentration of C-14 is lower in the ancient sample.

If a 1.00 gram sample of wood found in an archaelogical site in Arizona underwent 7.90x103
disintegrations in a given time period (e.g., 20 h) and a modern sample underwent 1.84x104 disintegrations in the same time period, how old is the ancient sample?

Homework Equations



First order:
ln[A]t = -kt + ln[A]o
[A]t = e-kt[A]o

ln(([A]o/2)/[A]o) = -kt1/2 = ln(1/2)
or ln2 = kt1/2 = 0.693

The Attempt at a Solution


kt1/2 = 0.693
k = 0.693/5730 = 1.21x10-4

ln[A]t = -kt + ln[A]o
ln[A]t = ?
ln[A]o = ?
Solve for t?
Is this the right equation to use?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
plexus0208 said:
kt1/2 = 0.693
t1/2 = 0.693/5730 = 1.21x10-4

t1/2 is given, simple mistake here.

Other than that go for

\frac {A_t} {A_0} = e^{-kt}

and it becomes almost simple plug and chug.

--
 
What do I use for At and A0?
The number of disintegrations?
 
Yes. You are interested in ratio of activities.

--
methods
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top