I How on Earth This is possible? (distance to a far galaxy)

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Prof Sabi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Earth Galaxy
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the galaxy ESO 325-G004, located 450 million light years away, which serves as a rare cosmic alignment between us and a more distant galaxy, currently 17 billion light years away. This alignment challenges common perceptions of cosmic distances, as the light from the distant galaxy has taken a significant amount of time to reach us, but the universe's expansion means its current distance is greater than when the light was emitted. Participants clarify that in an expanding universe, the distance light travels increases over time, leading to the conclusion that the time taken for light to reach us is longer than the simple calculation of distance divided by the speed of light. The conversation emphasizes the complexities of measuring cosmic distances and the implications for understanding the universe's age and expansion. This highlights the ongoing relevance of Einstein's theory of general relativity in explaining such phenomena.
Prof Sabi
Messages
33
Reaction score
4
https://amp.scroll.in/article/88372...ivity-holds-true-even-beyond-the-solar-system

Read the Section in this link:
Cosmic alignment
The galaxy we investigated has the catchy name ESO 325-G004 – let’s call it E325. Located some 450m light years away, it is one of the closest examples of a rare cosmic alignment – sitting directly between us and a second, more distant, galaxy. The background galaxy in this case is some 17 billion light years further behind. The centres of these two galaxies are aligned to better than one ten-thousandth of a degree.

17 billion light years? Isn't the universe 13.7 billion years old?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
At 17 Gly is where it is now, not at the time when it emitted the light that is captured in the picture.
 
BvU said:
At 17 Gly is where it is now, not at the time when it emitted the light that is captured in the picture.
Need a lil elaboration :eek: ... as I am imagining in this way that the light from that Galaxy literally took 17 billion years to travel to us in with velocity 'c'.
 
Prof Sabi said:
Need a lil elaboration :eek: ... as I am imagining in this way that the light from that Galaxy literally took 17 billion years to travel to us in with velocity 'c'.
Let's say the light is emitted at a distance D from the observer. In a non-expanding universe, that initial distance would remain constant in time, and it'd take t=D/c to cover the distance.
In an expanding universe, as the light travels, the distance D grows - both in the part that the light still has to cover, and the part already covered.
This means that the time needed to reach the observer is higher than t=D/c, and the distance at which the source galaxy ends up being by the time of reception is higher than the initial distance D.

edit: typo
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes alantheastronomer, davenn and jim mcnamara
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Asteroid, Data - 1.2% risk of an impact on December 22, 2032. The estimated diameter is 55 m and an impact would likely release an energy of 8 megatons of TNT equivalent, although these numbers have a large uncertainty - it could also be 1 or 100 megatons. Currently the object has level 3 on the Torino scale, the second-highest ever (after Apophis) and only the third object to exceed level 1. Most likely it will miss, and if it hits then most likely it'll hit an ocean and be harmless, but...

Similar threads

Back
Top