Testing How realistic is it to aim for a 2150 SAT score with only a month left to study?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Werg22
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sat
AI Thread Summary
Achieving a score of 2150 on the SAT within a month after scoring 1850 is ambitious but possible, especially with a strong background in mathematics. Effective study strategies are crucial; consistent practice and focused preparation can lead to improvement. However, past experiences indicate that without dedicated study, score increases may be minimal. The importance of SAT scores varies, and while they can enhance college applications, they are not the sole factor in admissions decisions. Additionally, the relevance of the writing section is uncertain, as it may not carry significant weight in evaluations. Consideration of the ACT as an alternative assessment is also suggested, as it may provide a better overall measure for some students.
Werg22
Messages
1,431
Reaction score
1
I recently got 1850 on my SAT 1. It's a good score, but nowhere near what I need. I am retaking the examination on January 27. From previous experiences and witnessing do you think it is realistic to set my goal to a score of 2150, with only a month left to practice? I am relatively strong in mathematics (there isn’t one problem that I have encountered on the SAT that I couldn’t solve) and quite average when it comes to verbal disciplines (scored a 4/6 on the essay). If it is in the realm of the possible, what study strategies do you recommend?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think if you actually study and practice it could be a pretty reasonable goal, but if you do what I did and not actually study or practice then don't expect your score to go up very much, I took it twice and got about the same score both times, but I'm not sure whether or not it would have made very much of a difference.
 
It has always been my opinion, as well as experance, that SAT's only matter only so much. What you have a should make you confortable, but if you want to boost it up a little more, I think your goal isn't that unrealistic. Just don't let your other studies slip because of the SATs looming over your head.

Another thing, I know the new system of the SATs is in full force now, but do you know for sure that the schools you are looking at are going to look at the writting section that much. From what was hearing since the writting is still fairly new it isn't weighted as much as the other scores when it comes to college admissions.

Also, if you still don't reach the score you wanted on the SATs many schools will also take the ACTs which, in my humble opinion, give a slightly better measure, and the college admissions people I worked with when I was applying to colleges three years ago often would concur.


Good Luck
 
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
8K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
33
Views
8K
Replies
25
Views
8K
Back
Top