How short a distance to come to a stop without sliding?

  • Thread starter Thread starter rachie9
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Short Sliding
AI Thread Summary
To determine how short a distance a railroad car can stop without sliding crates, the static friction coefficient of 0.5 is used to calculate the maximum deceleration, which is 4.9 m/s². The net force is zero to prevent sliding, and the relationship between acceleration and gravity is crucial. The discussion emphasizes using kinematic equations to relate initial velocity, acceleration, and distance. Sketching the scenario can help visualize the problem and identify relevant equations. Ultimately, the focus is on applying these principles to find the stopping distance effectively.
rachie9
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
A railroad car has crates in it with a coefficient of .5 w/ the car's floor. The train is moving at 22m/s, how short a distance can it be stopped w/o letting the crates slide?


Fnet = 0 because you don't want sliding.
a = coefficient of static friction x gravity



When I solved for a, I got 4.9m/s2. I know if I multiply this by the mass of the crates, it should be equal to the static friction force.

I think I have to take the derivative of the velocity to get acceleration, and the antiderivative of velocity to get distance, but how do I do this with no other variables?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I've not checked the working for the earlier part of the question.

I think I have to take the derivative of the velocity to get acceleration, and the antiderivative of velocity to get distance, but how do I do this with no other variables?

Draw sketches of the train at the start and the end of the problem, write on all the values you know, and see what equations you might be able to use. (Think kinematics.)
 
You have the initial velocity and the acceleration. You can find distance traveled from that information.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top