How should I simplify this product expression?

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
12 replies · 2K views
musicgold
Messages
303
Reaction score
19
Homework Statement
I need to simplify the following product expression and show it in factorial terms.
Relevant Equations
As shown below I have calculated the value of bn for 10 terms.
1569876566334.png

1569877136336.png


I see that when n is an even number, the product can be represented as ## \frac {2n} {(n+1)} ##. When n is an odd number, the denominator seems to be changing and I am not able to define an expression for it.

How should I go about solving this?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The equality also seems to hold for odd n:

##b_3 = 2.3/(3+1) = 6/4 = 3/4##
##b_5 = 2.5/(5+1) = 10/6 = 5/3##

and so on.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: musicgold
Math_QED said:
The equality also seems to hold for odd n:

##b_3 = 2.3/(3+1) = 6/4 = 3/4##
##b_5 = 2.5/(5+1) = 10/6 = 5/3##

and so on.

Oh..I totally missed it. Thanks.
How would a trained mathematician go about analyzing this kind of question? Would they do what I did - analyzing a first few steps?
 
musicgold said:
How would a trained mathematician go about analyzing this kind of question?
Write a few of the terms. If I start with ##P_4## (the product of the first three factors), I get
##\frac 4 3 \frac 9 8 \frac {16}{15} = \frac{2^23^34^2}{3\cdot8\cdot15}##
The numerator can already be expressed in terms of factorials, but I don't think the denominator can.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: musicgold
Mark44 said:
Write a few of the terms. If I start with ##P_4## (the product of the first three factors), I get
##\frac 4 3 \frac 9 8 \frac {16}{15} = \frac{2^23^34^2}{3\cdot8\cdot15}##
The numerator can already be expressed in terms of factorials, but I don't think the denominator can.
Yes, the denominator can ... well almost.

Factor the denominator. ##(k-1)(k+1)##Write out a few terms.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: musicgold
musicgold said:
Oh..I totally missed it. Thanks.
How would a trained mathematician go about analyzing this kind of question? Would they do what I did - analyzing a first few steps?
There are many factors that cancel numerator and denominator. I would write down some factors and see what cancels and what is left. Probably a lot cancels and if you are lucky, all you would be left with are at the beginning and the end.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: musicgold
I would do it the way you did, and hope I saw a pattern. Of course, one then has to prove this pattern is correct. For this, you can use induction.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: musicgold
if we take 3 successive terms we ll have
$$\frac{(k-1)(k-1)}{(k-2)k}\frac{kk}{(k-1)(k+1)}\frac{(k+1)(k+1)}{k(k+2)}$$ and after simplifications we are left with the two terms in the edges ##\frac{k-1}{k-2}## and ##\frac{k+1}{k+2}## which will get simplified by the previous and next terms so the total product will have all intermediate terms simplified to 1 and only the two outer-outer terms will survive which are the terms ##\frac{2}{1}## and ##\frac{n}{n+1}## giving the final solution $$\frac{2n}{n+1}$$
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: musicgold and FactChecker
SammyS said:
Yes, the denominator can [be written as factorials] ... well almost.

Factor the denominator. ##(k-1)(k+1)##

Write out a few terms.
Supposing you are interested in solving this with factorials, you might find it helpful to do the following prior to writing out a few terms.

Rewrite the product as follows.

##\displaystyle b_n = \prod_{k=2}^n {\ \dfrac{k^2}{k^2-1}} ##

## = \dfrac{\displaystyle \left( \prod_{k=2}^n k \right) \left( \prod_{k=2}^n k \right) }{\displaystyle \left( \prod_{k=2}^n (k-1) \right) \left( \prod_{k=2}^n (k+1) \right) } ##​

Write out a few terms, or do the general expanded expression using ellipses (...) .
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2 and FactChecker
SammyS said:
Supposing you are interested in solving this with factorials, you might find it helpful to do the following prior to writing out a few terms.

Rewrite the product as follows.

##\displaystyle b_n = \prod_{k=2}^n {\ \dfrac{k^2}{k^2-1}} ##

## = \dfrac{\displaystyle \left( \prod_{k=2}^n k \right) \left( \prod_{k=2}^n k \right) }{\displaystyle \left( \prod_{k=2}^n (k-1) \right) \left( \prod_{k=2}^n (k+1) \right) } ##​

Write out a few terms, or do the general expanded expression using ellipses (...) .

Cool!

So if I understand this correctly, all terms except ## \left( \prod_{k=2}^n (k+1) \right) ## can be converted into factorials, because the lowest term of that product will be 3. Is that correct?
 
musicgold said:
Cool!

So if I understand this correctly, all terms except ## \left( \prod_{k=2}^n (k+1) \right) ## can be converted into factorials, because the lowest term of that product will be 3. Is that correct?
That can be converted to factorial too, it is equal to ##(n+1)!/2##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: musicgold and SammyS
Delta2 said:
That can be converted to factorial too, it is equal to ##(n+1)!/2##
Great! Thanks