# How should one interpret ##\vec{f}=0## in an ideal battery?

In a circuit there are two forces that act on the charges to keep the current uniform through out,
##\vec{f}=\vec{E}+\vec{f_s}##, where ##\vec{E}## is the electrostatic field and ##\vec{f_s}## is the electric field produced by chemical reactions. Inside an ideal battery, ##\vec{E}## and ##\vec{f_s}##, oppose each other such that ##\vec{f}##, is zero. What exactly would be the correct way of thinking of ##\vec{f}=0##? I mean obviously the charges are moving, but it looks like in the battery they are not.

Dale
Mentor
2021 Award
I don't think that this is a correct analysis, but f=0 would imply that the charge is not accelerating rather than that it is not moving.

I don't think that this is a correct analysis, but f=0 would imply that the charge is not accelerating rather than that it is not moving.
I got it from Griffiths' Introduction to Electrodynamics. I know that would imply the charges are still moving, but how do I know that current is being produced?

Dale
Mentor
2021 Award
I know that would imply the charges are still moving, but how do I know that current is being produced?
Current = charges moving. They are the same thing. If you know that the charges are moving then you automatically know that there is current.

Current = charges moving. They are the same thing. If you know that the charges are moving then you automatically know that there is current.
But if the net force on the charges are zero, shouldn't the charges move about randomly cancelling out any current?

Dale
Mentor
2021 Award
No. If the net force is zero then they continue in a straight line at a constant speed.

No. If the net force is zero then they continue in a straight line at a constant speed.
So how do I know they started in a straight line?

Svein