How Should the Spring Constant k Affect the Efficiency of a Catapult?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on designing an experiment to measure the efficiency of a catapult, specifically how the spring constant k and the independent variable affect the results. The experiment aims to determine efficiency by comparing kinetic energy to elastic potential energy, using the formulas Ee=0.5kx^2 and Ek=0.5mv^2. Key considerations include whether to use a spring with a known constant k or to vary the spring constant, and whether the length of the catapult arm should be the independent variable. The participant seeks clarity on how to effectively gather data, particularly regarding the relationship between arm length, spring stretch, and torque. Ultimately, the goal is to measure the distance a projectile is launched at a consistent angle to assess efficiency.
pcgmks
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Independent variable and spring constant k

Hi all,
If someone could spare a minute to help answer my question I would appreciate it greatly,

I am trying to design an experiment to investigate the efficiency of a catapult,
But need help in what i should use as the independent variable-
and how i should use the spring constant k ( get a spring with a known constant k or change the constant each time)

I am using a Catapult- a standard weight- and will to measure distance of projectile.
find the kinetic energy- divide it by the Potential energy to get % efficiency,

2. Homework Equations

Elastic Potential Energy Ee=0.5kx^2 (hookes law)
Kinetic Energy Ek= 0.5mv^2 (v=d/t)

To find the Energy efficiency = Ek/Ee x100

3. The Attempt at a Solution

Need to clarify what i need to change each time to get a range of data,
Would the independent variable - being the length of the catapult arm work (is this the same as how far the spring or rubber band is stretched -the x in elastic pot. formula -) ?
or do I change something to do with the Elastic energy properties like the constant k?

the the dependent variable is how far the projectile is launched. and was thinking that i collect how far the weight is projected each time- from the same angle of 45*?

if anyone could help soon, it would be much appreciated,
thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Would it be easier if i had a spring with a known spring constant k and change the arm length each time,
( i know that a larger arm will make it go further but has it got to do with torque or is it irrelevant to this experiment),
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top