How space works:Why does an asteroid crush a human in space?

AI Thread Summary
Asteroids and fast-moving objects can crush a person in space due to the principles of momentum and inertia, not air resistance. When a high-speed object collides with a stationary one, the impact generates a force that can cause damage, regardless of the absence of air. The discussion highlights that the conservation of momentum applies, meaning that the moving object transfers its energy to the stationary one, leading to potential injury. The analogy of a spring illustrates that even without resistance, the impact force can still compress or damage objects. Overall, the physics of motion and impact remain consistent in space, confirming that collisions can indeed be harmful.
christian0710
Messages
407
Reaction score
8
I hve a question: IF there is no air resistance or ANY type of resistance in space, then how come an asteroid or fast moving object can crush a persons face in space (like in the movie: Gravity)

My logic is the following:


If you imagine a spring extended in space, and a fast moving ball hits the spring in one end, does the spring compress? If it does compress then there must be something in the other end of the spring (space) pushing against it right? Why would a spring compress if there is no resistance in the opposite side of impact? I would imagine the spring would just move. Even if you had one fragile egg in space and another egg moving 1000m/s crushing into the stationary egg,I would imagine both eggs would just move at half the speed of the 1 egg (the moving egg transmits ½ the movement onto the other), because IF there was no resistance in space then Could you not imagine this scenario: (This discription is happening in a split second)

1. The outer atoms of the edge of the fast moving egg, A, touch against the outer edge of the stationary egg ,B, this gives the egg a bit of movement. Now egg B is moving at 10th the speed of the the moving EGG, and the moving egg is loosing 1/10th of it's speed.
2. Egg B is still slower than Egg A,and Egg B keeps pushing harder and harder against Egg A (in a nanosecond) until they are moving at the same speed (because they are the same size, however the force of impact did not crush egg B or A because there is no resistance pushing in the opposite side of impact on egg B, so nothing is forcing the shell to crack from the opposide side of the impact site.)

Are there any experiments confirming or explaining this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
F=ma still applies in space. Mass has inertia, which makes larger masses harder to accelerate (or decelerate) than smaller ones.

What you describe is conservation of momentum, which is true but a different issue from whether the objects can survive the impact.
 
christian0710 said:
I hve a question: IF there is no air resistance or ANY type of resistance in space, then how come an asteroid or fast moving object can crush a persons face in space (like in the movie: Gravity)
As russ has pointed out, the issue here is momentum. Do you think air pressure has any significant role in what happens if a baseball batter gets hit in the head by the pitch? Whether his head is in the ballpark or in space, it doesn't want to move as fast as the ball wants it to move.
 
christian0710 said:
I hve a question: IF there is no air resistance or ANY type of resistance in space, then how come an asteroid or fast moving object can crush a persons face in space (like in the movie: Gravity)

My logic is the following:


If you imagine a spring extended in space, and a fast moving ball hits the spring in one end, does the spring compress? If it does compress then there must be something in the other end of the spring (space) pushing against it right? Why would a spring compress if there is no resistance in the opposite side of impact? I would imagine the spring would just move. Even if you had one fragile egg in space and another egg moving 1000m/s crushing into the stationary egg,I would imagine both eggs would just move at half the speed of the 1 egg (the moving egg transmits ½ the movement onto the other), because IF there was no resistance in space then Could you not imagine this scenario: (This discription is happening in a split second)

1. The outer atoms of the edge of the fast moving egg, A, touch against the outer edge of the stationary egg ,B, this gives the egg a bit of movement. Now egg B is moving at 10th the speed of the the moving EGG, and the moving egg is loosing 1/10th of it's speed.
2. Egg B is still slower than Egg A,and Egg B keeps pushing harder and harder against Egg A (in a nanosecond) until they are moving at the same speed (because they are the same size, however the force of impact did not crush egg B or A because there is no resistance pushing in the opposite side of impact on egg B, so nothing is forcing the shell to crack from the opposide side of the impact site.)

Are there any experiments confirming or explaining this?

Do you really think that if a car hits you on the road, it needs the (almost negligible) air resistance behind you to get injured? The air resistance can be ignored for a collision like that. The car may break your leg because, as you yourself note, in a fraction of a second the impact will accelerate you rapidly with a huge force.

Physics has to do with the real world. You are using your basic knowledge of physics to lose touch with the real world and how it works, rather than enhance your knowledge of how things work.
 
  • Like
Likes artyb
christian0710 said:
Why would a spring compress if there is no resistance in the opposite side of impact? I would imagine the spring would just move.
How can the other end accelerate, when no force is applied to it, because the spring isn't compressed at all.

christian0710 said:
Are there any experiments confirming or explaining this?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2009_satellite_collision
 
Last edited:
christian0710 said:
I hve a question: IF there is no air resistance or ANY type of resistance in space, then how come an asteroid or fast moving object can crush a persons face in space (like in the movie: Gravity)

Back up a bit. This whole thing is extremely puzzling. Do you mean that if this occurs on earth,ie. with the presence of air resistance, then you don't have any problem with it? For example, if I throw a 100 km/hr baseball into your face, you understand why it smashes your face if this happens on earth, but you don't understand why it still smashes your face if this were done in space, in vacuum?

Did I interpret this starting point correctly?

Zz.
 
ZapperZ said:
Did I interpret this starting point correctly?
yup
 
Back
Top