How Synchrotrons Produce X-Rays: A Layman's Explanation

AI Thread Summary
Synchrotrons produce X-rays through the acceleration of charged particles, which radiate electromagnetic waves as they are forced into a circular path by varying magnetic fields. The magnetic fields themselves do not directly create X-rays; instead, they maintain the particles' trajectory, leading to angular acceleration. This acceleration, whether linear or rotational, results in radiation, with synchrotron radiation being a specific type of Bremsstrahlung radiation caused by angular acceleration. The emitted radiation has a broad spectrum due to the nature of the acceleration involved. Overall, synchrotron radiation is a complex interplay of electric field dynamics and particle motion, fundamentally linked to the principles of electromagnetism.
Billy70
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone, first time poster.

A fairly basic question: What is the mechanism by which synchrotrons produce x-rays? (in more detail than e-beam + varying magnetic flux = x-rays)

I'm also still confused as to whether the mechanism is unique to magnetic fields or the same as Bremmstrahlung radiation, although even regarding that I'm coming across conflicting information on whether it is the retardation of the electrons or the interaction between electrons and the electric fields around atoms that produces radiation.

When reading about the Maxwell equations I can find more derivations than I can shake a stick at, however a nice, layman's terms explanation seems to be lacking.

Replies very much appreciated, condescending replies not so much, but expected since this is pretty fundamental.

Thanks in advance,
Billy
 
Science news on Phys.org
I don't know if I can give you more understanding then you already have without going into Maxwell's equations, but I will try. The varying magnetic fields used to confine the particles to a circular (or near-circular) track do not directly create x-rays. They are varying too slowly for this. What they do accomplish is to exert a force on the charged particles to keep them bending around the circular track. Charged particles that are accelerating radiate electromagnetic waves.

You can think of there being a radial electric field line pattern attached to every charged particle. When a particle jumps forward (accelerates), due to cause-and-effect and the finite speed of everything, the field lines far away from the particle jump forward later then the field lines close to the particle. This creates kinks in the electric field lines which travel away like waves on a string, and an electromagnetic wave is born.

The key is that there are two kinds of fundamental types of acceleration, linear and rotational, and both lead to radiation. Linear acceleration of charge would be like the current driving charges forward and backward in a straight radio antenna. But forcing a charge to curve into a circular path even if its speed is constant is also a form of acceleration and leads to radiation. Oscillatory accelerations (like in a radio antenna) lead to a train of smooth "kinks" in the field lines, so the radiation is nearly single frequency. A more constant acceleration leads to a broader smear of frequencies in the emitted radiation. So bremstrahlung and synchrotron radiation are similar in that they are non-oscillatory decelerations, but bremstrahlung typically refers to that caused by a linear deceleration, whereas synchrotron radiation is caused by an angular acceleration (curving of the charged particles by the bending magnets). Note that radiation can also be achieved in synchrotron using wigglers.
 
Every electric charge emits radiation when accelerating. Magnetic flux has no direct importance - it just causes the beam to bend, thus to accelerate charged particles with centriprocal force.

You are right - synchrotron radiation is a kind of Bremsstrahlung radiation.

You should try really good classical (40 years old) article by Ginzburg http://cdsads.u-strasbg.fr/cgi-bin/nph-bib_query?bibcode=1969ARA&A...7..375G
- no one may explain synchrotron radiation better in a quick response on the forum.
 
Thanks very much guys. Excellent explanations that have cleared it up nicely.
 
I was watching a Khan Academy video on entropy called: Reconciling thermodynamic and state definitions of entropy. So in the video it says: Let's say I have a container. And in that container, I have gas particles and they're bouncing around like gas particles tend to do, creating some pressure on the container of a certain volume. And let's say I have n particles. Now, each of these particles could be in x different states. Now, if each of them can be in x different states, how many total...
Thread 'Why work is PdV and not (P+dP)dV in an isothermal process?'
Let's say we have a cylinder of volume V1 with a frictionless movable piston and some gas trapped inside with pressure P1 and temperature T1. On top of the piston lay some small pebbles that add weight and essentially create the pressure P1. Also the system is inside a reservoir of water that keeps its temperature constant at T1. The system is in equilibrium at V1, P1, T1. Now let's say i put another very small pebble on top of the piston (0,00001kg) and after some seconds the system...
Back
Top