How the Classic Loop the loop works

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the mechanics of a ball rolling through a loop-the-loop, specifically addressing the forces at play when the ball is at the top of the loop. It highlights that both gravity and the normal force act downward, but the ball remains on the track due to its tangential velocity and centripetal acceleration. The comparison to a projectile illustrates that while both the ball and a flung pebble experience downward acceleration, the ball's path is curved by the track, allowing it to stay on course. If the ball's speed is insufficient, it will lose contact with the track at the top of the loop. Ultimately, the ball remains on the track as long as the tangent angle is steeper than its velocity vector.
PhysicsInNJ
Messages
44
Reaction score
1
Through some of the conservation of energy problems we've been working recently with the loop the loop (ball rolls down ramp and around a circular track.) there is one concept that is irritating me. This is not a homework problem but a mash up of the driving concepts from a few different problems.

At the top, what makes the ball stay up there. The normal force and gravity both point downward. There is no force keeping it up. Or is it that the combination of tangential velocity caused by centripetal acceleration along with the downward forces acts to make the motion follow the loop.

Also, to clarify, the centripetal force in this case would be Fn and Fg right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
PhysicsInNJ said:
At the top, what makes the ball stay up there. The normal force and gravity both point downward. There is no force keeping it up.
It's not being kept up. It's being accelerated downwards by both gravity and the normal force. But it moves down in a curve that follows the track rather than straight down, because it has horizontal velocity.

A useful comparison is with a projectile like a flung pebble that has the same velocity as the ball. It too is being accelerated downwards, but doesn't fall straight down because of its horizontal velocity component. The ball on the track will accelerate downwards faster than a flung pebble right next to it (but slightly away from the track), with the same velocity, because the ball has the additional downwards acceleration from the track's normal force.

As I'm sure you know, if the ball is going too slowly, it will fall away from the track when it nears the top.

The basic rule is that the ball will stay on the track as long as the angle of the tangent to the track is more downwards-pointing than the ball's velocity vector.
 
So basically its like a projectile that happens to be following the path of the loop
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top