How Thick Should the Aluminum Sheet Be for the Box to Float as Described?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Menisto
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Principle
AI Thread Summary
To determine the thickness of an aluminum sheet for a closed cubical box to float with 25% of its volume above water, the effective density of the box must be 750 kg/m^3. The mass of the aluminum sheet is calculated as 16200 x(s^2), where s is the side length and x is the thickness. However, the discussion reveals a lack of sufficient information to accurately solve the problem, as surface area does not directly correlate with volume. Even precise calculations of aluminum volume versus air volume do not yield a definitive solution. The frustration stems from the complexity of the problem and inconsistencies in the professor's course materials.
Menisto
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
A closed cubical box made of aluminum sheet floats in water with (1/4) of the volume above water. Determine the thickness of the sheet.

I first found out what the density would need to be for this orientation:

75% below water or

X % = density of box/ density of water

.75 = p/(1000)

p = 750 kg/m^3 --> effective density.

p = M(sheet) / Volume(box)

Mass of the sheet is then = 6p(s^2)x

where s is the length of a side of the cube, x is the thickness of the sheet and p is the density of aluminum (2700 kg/m^3)

M = 16200 x(s^2)

Therefore: 750 = 16200 x(s^2) / s^3

.0463 = x/s

The problem is, there seems to be not enough information.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Am I correct in assuming this?
 
Menisto said:
The problem is, there seems to be not enough information.
You are correct. Surface area is not proportional to volume. Even if you did a more precise calculation of the volume of aluminum as the difference between outer volume and inner volume, you can still go from essentially a solid cube of aluminum to a huge cube with a very small ratio of aluminum volume to air volume (low density) using the same thickness of walls. There has to be more information to solve the problem.
 
Ok, thank you. I thought I was going crazy there for a second, too many hours of homework. It doens't help when the professor makes his own course packet, and has to correct problems and answers for every homework set. It gets a little frustrating.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top