How to Achieve Uniform Distribution of Points on a Sphere?

kaksmet
Messages
81
Reaction score
0
Hello

I am trying to make a uniform distribution of points on a sphere. I can find the answer
\theta=\pi R_1
\phi = arccos(1-2R_2)

where R1 and R2 are uniformly distributed random numbers between 0 and 1.

To me, it feels like
\theta=\pi R_1 sin(R1)
\phi = 2\pi R_2
should also give the correct distribution. Is that the case, and if not how can I understand why not this but the above solution is true? How can I calculate my way to the first answer?

thanks!
Tomas
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, you want a parametrization x(u,v) : (0,1) x (0,1) -> the unit sphere S2
such that the unit of area
|x_u \times x_v|
is constant, where \times is the cross product.

It should be simple to verify that this works for the solution given but does not work for your solution. To be more specific, in the solution given,
x(R1,R2) = s(pi R1, arccos(1-2R2))
where s is the function for spherical coordinates, i.e. s(theta, phi) = (sin theta cos phi, sin theta sin phi, cos theta)
 
Last edited:
To write theta and phi in terms of uniforms you first need to find their joint density. Since the points are uniformly distributed over the area, the probability of the rectangle [theta,theta+dt] x [phi,phi+dp] is the proportional to the area on the sphere which is
the magnitude of the cross product [dx/dtheta] x [dx/dphi] *(dt*dp).

From this by normalizing you get the joint density f(theta,phi) and integrate to get a marginal density e.g. f(theta) and a conditional density f(phi|theta). The cumulative distribution of any random variable is uniformly distributed, so theta=F^{-1}(R1) and phi=F^{-1}(R2|theta)=F^{-1}(R2|F^{-1}(R1)).

Hope this helps - what answer do you get from this process?
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top