How to approach this Brownian Motion Problems

xiaozegu
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Attachments

  • L@X%60QP9MHGXO$3%25KNOFF%7D]7.jpg
    L@X%60QP9MHGXO$3%25KNOFF%7D]7.jpg
    20.1 KB · Views: 523
Physics news on Phys.org
Why do you think there's a difference? Isn't it just the universal gas constant in both cases?
 
clamtrox said:
Why do you think there's a difference? Isn't it just the universal gas constant in both cases?

Is Bolye's law's Ra equal to the R in the PV=NRT?
Bolye's law is PV = RaT
 
xiaozegu said:
Is Bolye's law's Ra equal to the R in the PV=NRT?
Bolye's law is PV = RaT

Sorry, but that's gibberish. Read more carefully what is done.

The ideal gas law is PV = nRT, where n is the number of moles of gas, V is volume, p is pressure, T is temperature and R is the gas constant.

The form used in the book you quote has instead v = V/n, volume per mole, and reads Pv = RT.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
clamtrox said:
Sorry, but that's gibberish. Read more carefully what is done.

The ideal gas law is PV = nRT, where n is the number of moles of gas, V is volume, p is pressure, T is temperature and R is the gas constant.

The form used in the book you quote has instead v = V/n, volume per mole, and reads Pv = RT.

Thanks. But I still do not know how to interpret the n and n0 in the after equation. Isn't n is 1 mol?
 
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.

Similar threads

Back
Top