How to become a quality physicist?

  • Thread starter Thread starter quantumfireball
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physicist Quality
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around strategies for becoming a quality physicist, particularly focusing on learning theoretical physics efficiently. Participants share their experiences and suggest resources, emphasizing the importance of foundational knowledge and effective study techniques.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that learning mathematics first and using quality textbooks is essential for understanding physics.
  • Another participant recommends Gerard ’t Hooft's guide on becoming a theoretical physicist and shares a link to a resource with various study materials.
  • A later reply expresses appreciation for the resources shared and discusses the challenge of integrating theoretical knowledge with practical experience from mechanical tools and equipment.
  • One participant argues that basic, freshman-level calculus-based physics textbooks should not be discounted, as they often explain concepts better than graduate-level texts, which can be confusing even for advanced students.
  • This participant emphasizes the value of fully understanding a basic text over struggling with more advanced material, sharing personal experiences of referring back to introductory texts for clarity.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the appropriateness of graduate-level versus introductory textbooks for learning physics. There is no consensus on a single best approach, as experiences and preferences vary.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note the overwhelming nature of the material available and the challenge of connecting theoretical knowledge with practical experience. The discussion reflects a range of personal learning strategies and the subjective nature of understanding complex topics.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students transitioning from engineering to physics, educators seeking to understand student perspectives, and anyone interested in improving their study methods in theoretical physics.

quantumfireball
Messages
90
Reaction score
0
How to become a quality physicist?

Hi I am a 21 year old male.
Im studying in final year of electronics engineering.
However my true love is theoretical physics.
I read a lot of graduate level physics textbooks however i can digest very little.
as a result of which i have become extremely inefficient.
could anyone give me some tips to learn physics very effieciently and at the same
time develope a very deep understanding of theoretical physics?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Learn the math first, and use quality textbooks.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks Bryan, for two great looking links.
I have started a folder for things to study, and with help from this forum, hope to connect a lot of loose ends involving things i have learned from some study, and things i know from hands on use of all sorts of mechanical tools, and equipment, of which i have used, maintained, and repaired.
At age 65, it is never too late to learn how to get the answers to questions i have had for many years. Having obtained many college textbooks, and other references, the task seems overwhelming but with the internet and all the quick link transfer options, my sofa can now have room for someone to set on it.
Thanks again

Ron
 
This may sound weird, but I wouldn't be so quick to discount basic, freshman level calculus-based physics textbooks. Graduate level physics textbooks can be a bit challenging. I often don't fully understand them, and I'm a graduate student! But the introductory level calculus-based texts tend to do a much better job explaining the concepts, while still offering some level of mathematical treatment. They won't fully explain the theory to you, but they'll give you the tools you need to read the more advanced textbooks. In my senior year of college I often referred to my freshman text when studying for my optics final. And even as a graduate student, I often find myself referring to my students' introductory textbook to understand material that I haven't covered for years (then comes the task of pretending that I'm competent to teach it to them).

Ultimately, I think that reading a basic level text and understanding everything is far better than reading a graduate level text and being thoroughly confused. If you're like me, you end up wanting to punch the author in the face for all the grief he's put you through!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
822
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
6K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K