How to Calculate Acceleration for a Car Speeding from 10m/s to 15m/s in 80m"

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the acceleration needed for a car speeding from 10 m/s to 15 m/s over a distance of 80 m, the appropriate equation is vf² = vi² + 2ad, where vf is the final velocity, vi is the initial velocity, and d is the distance. The initial equations provided were not suitable since they assume an initial velocity of zero. The correct approach involves rearranging the equation to solve for acceleration (a). After substituting the known values, the acceleration can be determined. This method effectively addresses the problem of calculating acceleration in scenarios with non-zero initial velocities.
Oceanspire
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Poster has been reminded that they need to show some effort when posting schoolwork problems
1. What acceleration would be needed by a car speeding up from 10 m/s to 15 m/s in 80 m?2. The equations I have at my use right now are:
V = at
D = (1/2)(a)(t)^2
T = square root of 2D / A
A = change in velocity / time3. I honestly can't wrap my mind around how to solve this
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Oceanspire said:
1. What acceleration would be needed by a car speeding up from 10 m/s to 15 m/s in 80 m?2. The equations I have at my use right now are:
V = at
D = (1/2)(a)(t)^2
T = square root of 2D / A
A = change in velocity / time
3. I honestly can't wrap my mind around how to solve this
Welcome to PF!

Your equations are valid when the initial velocity is zero. It is not the case in the problem.
 
Can't you use vf2 = vi2 + 2ad ?

You have vf, vi, d, and now you will have to find a.

:)
 
Last edited:
Antonius said:
Can't you use vf = vi + 2ad ?

You have vf, vi, d, and now you will have to find a.

:)
Don't you need to square those velocities ?
 
SammyS said:
Don't you need to square those velocities ?
SammyS said:
Don't you need to square those velocities ?

sorry
i edited it now (Y)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top