How to Calculate Average Force Vectors During a Collision?

  • Thread starter Thread starter iluvphys
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force Vectors
iluvphys
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
Hi friends,
I am preparing for my exam and i am stuck with this problem, please help me out.
It won't take too long, I hope.

Homework Statement


Two bodies A and B have masses mA and mB respectively and collide completely inelastic.
Given that the mass of body A is 1200 kg and body B is 800 kg determine the avergage force vectors acting on each body during the collision. The collision itself lasts for 0.2 s.


Homework Equations


Velocity of body A: (5i + 3j) m/s
Velocity of body B: (-i + 4j) m/s

Common velocity after collision I found to be: (2.6i + 3.4j) m/s (this eq was derived in a previous question with mA = 3/2 mB)

The Attempt at a Solution


Well, I have tried using the momentum impulse theorem only to find out that the total momentum was conserved, which is good indeed. However I don't know how to find the answer I have kind of like used up my knowledge on impulse.
The answer is (-14400i + 2400j) N.
I have no clue how this answer was derived.
Please help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To find the force on a given body, use the impulse-momentum theorem:

\vec{F}\Delta t = \Delta (m\vec{v})

What's the change in momentum of body A?
 
I have tried this equation but I just seem to get -4000i+16000j. But this seems to be wrong.
Any further advice? I mean I substituted the final momentum from the initial momentum of A and divided by time, which however is initial momentum of B.
Doesnt make sense. Please help
 
Do it step by step:
(1) Find the change in velocity of A. (Final velocity minus initial.)
(2) Then find the change in momentum.
(3) Then the force.
 
Hi Doc Al,
I am really sorry for the late response but I was so busy studying that i haven't been able to check the post.
THank you very much for your help, I finally got it (actually right now). I followed your steps and I am really thankful for your help.
 
Excellent. (And you are very welcome.)
 
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top