How to calculate center coordinates of two reverse arcs in 3D space

Brad_
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hi,

Given 3D points P1(200,60,140), P2(300,120,110), P3(3,0,-1), P4(-100,0,-1) and the radius of
arc C1MP3 is equal to radius of arc C2MP1. How do I calculate coordinates x, y, z of
points C1 and C2? See this image.

Points C1 and C2 are centers of two reverse arcs which are tangent to each other at point M which lies on ray Q1Q2.
Arc C1MP3 is tangent to ray P3P4 and arc C2MP1 is tangent to ray P1P2.



Points Q1 and Q2 emerge as a result of moving points P1 and P3 in the direction obvious from picture.
It is easy to calculate centers of arcs with different radius. But how to calculate centers of arcs
with equal radius. How to find the position of points Q1 and Q2?
 

Attachments

  • reversearcs.PNG
    reversearcs.PNG
    13.7 KB · Views: 508
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF;
We do not know the curves are in the same plane?
 
And it doesn't appear from the diagram that the arcs are necessarily circular, either. That is, it doesn't appear that the entire curve lies within a single plane.
 
Perhaps you can phrase the problem as asking for the centers of two spheres of equal radius whose surfaces are tangent at some point and such that line P1P2 is tangent to the surface of one sphere and line P3P4 is tangent to the surface of the other.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
Back
Top