How to Calculate Earth’s Number Density: Iron vs Proton Mass Method

  • Thread starter Thread starter Planters99
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Density Earth
AI Thread Summary
To calculate Earth's number density, it is suggested to consider the composition of the Earth, primarily focusing on iron or using the average particle mass of a proton. The discussion highlights that while Earth's density is known, number density requires the number of particles per volume, which can be approximated using silicate minerals like SiO3 due to their abundance. Additionally, the mean free path of a small black hole created from proton collisions is discussed, indicating that if the path is significantly larger than Earth's diameter, the black hole may pass through without interaction. However, the potential oscillation of black holes raises questions about their interaction with matter. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the complexity of calculating number density and the factors influencing black hole interactions.
Planters99
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I was wondering what is the best way to calculate the number density of earth? Should we assume that the Earth is mostly Iron and calculate the N from there or should we assume the average particle mass is the mass of a proton?

Also if a small black hole is created on Earth and makes one passage through Earth how can we calculate the mass it sweeps up? I calculated the mean free path of this black hole created from two protons colliding and I get a mean free path that is extremely large >>>>>> the diameter of earth. Does this mean the black hole will not interact with anything and go right through earth? I am not quite sure about this because don't black holes oscillate?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Planters99 said:
I was wondering what is the best way to calculate the number density of earth? Should we assume that the Earth is mostly Iron and calculate the N from there or should we assume the average particle mass is the mass of a proton?
Or you could Wiki it: 5.5153 g/cm³
 
That is density not number density. Number density is number of particles over volume and basically my question is what is the best particle to use for the Earth Iron? Proton? Electron?
 
Without looking at specific minerals, the best you could calculate would be a mean number density. Oxygen and silicon are the most abundant elements in the Earth's crust, so silicate (SiO_3) might give you a reasonable starting point for a rough calculation.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top