How to calculate errors for fit parameters?

AI Thread Summary
To calculate errors for fit parameters using the least squares method, one approach is to vary individual parameters while optimizing others and track the increase in the sum of squares. This method helps in estimating the sensitivity of the fit to changes in parameters. Alternatively, utilizing existing fitting programs can simplify the process, as they typically include built-in functions for error estimation. These programs can provide more accurate and efficient calculations compared to manual methods. Understanding both approaches can enhance the analysis of fit parameters and their associated errors.
Xaron
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I use the least squares method in a small C-programm to fit some data points. But don't know how to get the errors of the calculated parameter.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You can track how the sum of squares increase if you vary individual parameters (and optimize the other parameters). Alternatively, use existing fit programs, they have that implemented.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
31
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
6K
Back
Top