How to Calculate Gravitational Potential Energy for a Swinging Toy?

  • Thread starter Thread starter stanton
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the gravitational potential energy (PE) of a 40 N toy in a swing with 2.0 m ropes, the relevant formula is PE = mgy, where y is the height relative to the lowest position. When the ropes are horizontal, the height is equal to the length of the rope, resulting in maximum potential energy. At a 30-degree angle with the vertical, the height can be calculated using the cosine of the angle to find the vertical displacement. At the bottom of the swing, the potential energy is zero since the height is zero. The discussion highlights the need for clarity in applying the gravitational potential energy formula in different positions of the swing.
stanton
Messages
74
Reaction score
0
1. Homework Statement

A 40 N toy is placed in a light swing that is attached to ropes 2.0m long. Find the gravitational potential energy associated with the toy relative to its lowest position when (a) the ropes are horizontal (b) the ropes make a 30 degrees angle with the vertical and (c) at the bottom of the circular arc.

2. Homework Equations

PEg = mgy (note: y is distance)
Wg = -mg(yf-yi)=mgyi-mgyf=PEi-PEf
Wg=-deltaPE

3. The Attempt at a Solution

I do not know what to start. Well, as my prop show a similar problem with (b) problem, I tried to draw free body diagram. like vertical = y-axis and horizontal = x axis. So the the rope and y-axis makes a sort of triangle. and the unknown length of the one side of triangle must be length of cord multiplied by cos30. And I cant' go further. Maybe I went down all wrong. Will you help?
If I am asked solve the length between the maximum point reached by toy or something like that, I think I can do it. However, about energy, I am confused.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
At the bottom PE = ...?
a) The rope is horizontal. So the displacement is L ( length of the rope). So PE = ...?
b) The displacement is (L - Lcasθ). So PE =...?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top