How to Calculate Initial Velocity in a Same Direction Crash Without Tire Marks?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Colm2243
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Crash
AI Thread Summary
To find the initial velocity of a vehicle involved in a same-direction crash without tire marks or braking, the principle of conservation of momentum is essential. The momentum before and after the collision can be expressed using the formula: m_A(before) * v_A(before) + m_B(before) * v_B(before) = m_A(after) * v_A(after) + m_B(after) * v_B(after). If the pre-collision velocities are unknown, additional data such as the post-collision behavior, like the distance traveled after separation, can help estimate the initial velocities. The discussion also touches on the relevance of translation symmetry and momentum in non-relativistic physics. Understanding these principles is crucial for accurately determining the initial conditions of the vehicles involved in the crash.
Colm2243
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
What formula(s) would I use to find the initial velocity of a vehicle that has impacted a second vehicle in a same direction crash. There are no tire marks on the roadway and no braking involved. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In physics, there is something called translation symmetry, meaning that the fundamental properties of the Universe does not depend on where you are. Out of this symmetry, a phenomena known as momentum arises. In non-relativistic velocities, this is a good approximation.

From your post, I assume that the first car (called car A) hits the second car (car B) from behind. No matter if some kinetic energy is converted to heat energy via friction, the sum of the momentum for car A and the momentum of car B before the impact is the same as the sum of the momentum for car A and the momentum for car B after the impact.

m_{A(before)} v_{A(before)} ~+~ m_{B(before)}v_{B(before)}~ = m_{A(after)} v_{A(after)} ~+~ m_{B(after)} v_{B(after)}

Solve for the velocity for A before the crash if you have access to the other values.
 
Last edited:
Moridin said:
In physics, there is something called translation symmetry, meaning that the fundamental properties of the Universe does not depend on where you are. Out of this symmetry, a phenomena known as momentum arises. In non-relativistic velocities, this is a good approximation.

From your post, I assume that the first car (called car A) hits the second car (car B) from behind. No matter if some kinetic energy is converted to heat energy via friction, the sum of the momentum for car A and the momentum of car B before the impact is the same as the sum of the momentum for car A and the momentum for car B after the impact.

m_{A(before)} v_{A(before)} ~+~ m_{B(before)}v_{B(before)}~ = m_{A(after)} v_{A(after)} ~+~ m_{B(after)} v_{B(after)}

Solve for the velocity for A before the crash if you have access to the other values.
I don't have the values for pre collision velocity on either vehicle. How can I determine this? A wall was impacted after the two vehicles became stuck together and after impact with the wall vehicle two separated and rolled over and skid to a stop 40 feet after separation on it' s roof.
 
Moridin said:
In non-relativistic velocities, this is a good approximation.
Translation symmetry only exists in the Newtonian limit?!?
 
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Dear all, in an encounter of an infamous claim by Gerlich and Tscheuschner that the Greenhouse effect is inconsistent with the 2nd law of thermodynamics I came to a simple thought experiment which I wanted to share with you to check my understanding and brush up my knowledge. The thought experiment I tried to calculate through is as follows. I have a sphere (1) with radius ##r##, acting like a black body at a temperature of exactly ##T_1 = 500 K##. With Stefan-Boltzmann you can calculate...
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (First part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8 and stuck at some statements. It's little bit confused. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. Solution : The surface bound charge on the ##xy## plane is of opposite sign to ##q##, so the force will be...
Back
Top