How to Calculate Probability using Density Operator?

Guilherme Vieira
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello, I'm trying to understand how to calculate de probability of finding a system in a specific eigenstate using the density operator. In the book of Balian, Haar, Gregg I've found a good definition of it being the expectation value of the projector Pr in the orientation of the eingenstate.
P(a) = tr(D.Pra)
The problem is, since I have then a product between de density matrix tr(D.Pra), Pra would have to be a matrix of the same rank of D, write ? To calculate then the tr. What is the right way to construct the projection ?
Transform the state, a vector, into a matrix ? Beeing a matrix with just one element in the main diagonal for each of the a directions relative to each eingenstate ?

I'm a new member, so I'm not used to ask questions online. Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi. I'll start from the beginning. If u have a density operator, call it $$\hat{D},$$ and some eigenstate, call it $$|\psi>.$$ You can simply make a projector to that eigenstate: $$ \hat{P}= | \psi> <\psi|.$$Then the probability of finding your system in that eigenstate is defined as $$ Tr( \hat{D} \hat{P}). $$ If u have a problem of writing that projector operator, here's help. U must write that bra state in some basis, and just multiply bra and ket vectors, u get a matrix with the same dimensions as your density operator and that's it. If you have problems with that multiplication of bra and ket vectors, search an article on wikipedia and that will help you. You can then multiply density operator and that projector and take trace of that final matrix.
 
  • Like
Likes Guilherme Vieira
If your density operator is ##\rho## and your pure state is ##\psi##, the projector is ##P=\psi\psi^*## and the probability is
##p## = Trace ##\rho P## = Trace ##\rho\psi\psi^*=\psi^*\rho\psi##
since the trace of ##uv^*## is ##v^*u##.
 
  • Like
Likes bhobba and Guilherme Vieira
Thank you.
But, the definition of the density operator is not
ρ=|ψ><ψ| or ρ=∑|ψi><ψi| ?

Then it'is like the projector and the density operator are the same thing, or almost the same thing.
 
Guilherme Vieira said:
But, the definition of the density operator is not
ρ=|ψ><ψ| or ρ=∑|ψi><ψi| ?

Then it'is like the projector and the density operator are the same thing, or almost the same thing.
The density operator of a pure state is indeed its projector. But the projector has a second use as an observable for the response of a system in an arbitrary state to a measurement of the pure state.
 
  • Like
Likes Guilherme Vieira
A. Neumaier said:
The density operator of a pure state is indeed its projector. But the projector has a second use as an observable for the response of a system in an arbitrary state to a measurement of the pure state.
Thanks, that is enlightening
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top