How to Calculate the Amplitude for a Particle in State |x>?

Agnostic
Messages
110
Reaction score
0
<-z|x> is the amplitude for a particle in state |x> to be in state |-z>.

a particle in state |x> can be in |+x> or |-x>, correct?

|+x> = [1/sqrt(2)]|+z> + [1/sqrt(2)]|-z>

|-x> = [1/sqrt(2)]|+z> - [1/sqrt(2)]|-z>


How would this be calculated?


Would the amplitude be:

<-z|+x> + <-z|-x>?

|<-z|+x>| + |<-z|-x>|?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I've never seen the |-z\rangle notation before. But -|z\rangle is a common one.

Daniel.
 
I've used this notation before, but there was always a differentiation between |+x> and |-x>, I never saw just |x>. Perhaps |x> means |+x>?

If this is the case in order to get the amplitude you want <-z|+x>. Only do |<-z|+x>| for the probablility.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top