How to calculate the foraging radius of a bird?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around verifying the solution for a specific equation from a paper, with the equation provided in LaTeX format. The equation involves several variables, including energy, mass, and time, with specific values given for each. A participant raises concerns about potential errors in the equation's parentheses and suggests that there might be a missing or unbalanced parenthesis. Another participant attempts to calculate the result but arrives at a significantly different value, indicating confusion over the formula or potential arithmetic mistakes. Additionally, there are concerns about unit consistency in the calculations. Access to the original paper is limited due to a paywall, hindering further verification of the equation and calculations.
Manassa Mauler
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I would love someone to verify the answer for equation 8 in this paper (bottom of page 263) http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1365-2028.2002.00368.x/epdf

For the sake of clarity here is the equation is LaTeX which you can render at the following link
\frac{QC + Q\lambda \sigma - T(_{Ema + \frac{_{Emc}}{2}}))}{2k + \frac{2Qd}{V}}
https://www.codecogs.com/latex/eqneditor.php

The inputs are:
Q = 5.2 * 10^6 Joules
C =1.5 kg
lambda = 0.055 kg per hour
sigma = 12 hours
T = 48 hours
Ema = 42 Watts
Emc =24 Watts
k=2 Joules per meter
V =45 km per hour
The answer should be 205 km

Thanks!
 
Last edited:
Biology news on Phys.org
\frac{QC + Q\lambda \sigma - T(_{Ema + \frac{_{Emc}}{2}}))}{2k + \frac{2Qd}{V}}
 
Well. it seems to me the parentheses are unbalanced in the numerator, is one "open" parenthesis missing somewhere? Or can we assume it is okay to drop the very last one?
 
I apologise but I was incorrect when I looked at it again. Here is the correct version
Q <- 5.2 * 10^6 Joules
C <- 1.5 kg
d <- 0.055 kg per hour
t <- 12 hours
Time <- 48 hours
Ema <- 24 Watts
Emc <- 42 Watts
k <- 2 joules per meter
V <- 45 km per hour
Thanks for looking at this Jim
CodeCogsEqn.png
 
Show your work, please. I get 1693. But what you posted may not be what you and I solved.
My calculation seems ridiculous to me. So I am guessing the formula has a problem - or I can't do arithmetic. Either is possible. Plus, I think there may be a problem with units.

PS: the paper you linked is behind a paywall for me. So I cannot verify anything including my work.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Did they discover another descendant of homo erectus?'
The study provides critical new insights into the African Humid Period, a time between 14,500 and 5,000 years ago when the Sahara desert was a green savanna, rich in water bodies that facilitated human habitation and the spread of pastoralism. Later aridification turned this region into the world's largest desert. Due to the extreme aridity of the region today, DNA preservation is poor, making this pioneering ancient DNA study all the more significant. Genomic analyses reveal that the...
Popular article referring to the BA.2 variant: Popular article: (many words, little data) https://www.cnn.com/2022/02/17/health/ba-2-covid-severity/index.html Preprint article referring to the BA.2 variant: Preprint article: (At 52 pages, too many words!) https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.02.14.480335v1.full.pdf [edited 1hr. after posting: Added preprint Abstract] Cheers, Tom
https://www.nhs.uk/mental-health/conditions/body-dysmorphia/ Most people have some mild apprehension about their body, such as one thinks their nose is too big, hair too straight or curvy. At the extreme, cases such as this, are difficult to completely understand. https://www.msn.com/en-ca/health/other/why-would-someone-want-to-amputate-healthy-limbs/ar-AA1MrQK7?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=68ce4014b1fe4953b0b4bd22ef471ab9&ei=78 they feel like they're an amputee in the body of a regular person "For...
Back
Top