Quantum Velocity
- 73
- 6
To make antimatter you have to change the charge of proton and electron. So how do you do it
The discussion revolves around the concept of changing the charge of protons and electrons, particularly in the context of antimatter creation. Participants explore the nature of particle charges, the generation of antimatter, and the implications of quantum electrodynamics on charge behavior.
Participants do not reach a consensus on the initial question of changing charge, with multiple competing views about the nature of antimatter and the behavior of charge at different energy scales. The discussion also reflects uncertainty regarding the implications of quantum electrodynamics.
There are limitations in the discussion regarding the assumptions made about charge constancy and the complexities introduced by quantum electrodynamics. The conversation also touches on the appropriateness of the thread's level for such advanced topics.
This discussion may be of interest to those exploring concepts in particle physics, antimatter, and quantum electrodynamics, as well as individuals curious about the historical challenges in understanding particle charge behavior.
Hello bhobba. This has confused me. Should we take your first sentence literally? As I understand (understood) it, an electron has a charge which I thought was considered to be a fundamental constant. But in your first sentence you seem to be suggesting its charge is not a constant but somehow increases as something gets closer to it. Does that really happen?bhobba said:Just as an added twist the closer you get to an electron the bigger the charge - it depends on the energy scale. It was this that confused the early pioneers and led to infinities and the invention of renormalisation to tame it. The full understanding came with the work of Wilson he got a Nobel for:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Renormalization_group
Thanks
Bill
There is a constant, and both classically and (with some corners being cut) in non-relativistic quantum mechanics an electron is an idealized point particle with charge equal to that constant; it's the field strength that becomes infinite as you move arbitrarily close to the electron. It gets much messier in quantum electrodynamics, and that's what Bhobba is talking about.Dadface said:As I understand (understood) it, an electron has a charge which I thought was considered to be a fundamental constant.
Nugatory said:I'm not sure that a B-level thread is the right place to carry on this discussion; we've already come close to hijacking the original thread.







Dadface said:I have looked at the wiki article and have also searched elsewhere but am still none the wiser. Would you be able to clarify the matter please? Thank you.