How to change electron and proton charge

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of changing the charge of protons and electrons, particularly in the context of antimatter creation. Participants explore the nature of particle charges, the generation of antimatter, and the implications of quantum electrodynamics on charge behavior.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that to create antimatter, one must change the charge of protons and electrons.
  • Another participant counters that antimatter particles are not made by changing the charge of their matter counterparts, but rather through high-energy processes that produce them, such as proton-proton collisions.
  • A participant mentions the concept of charge increasing as one approaches an electron, linking this to historical challenges in physics and the development of renormalization.
  • There is a discussion about the nature of an electron's charge being a fundamental constant, with some participants noting that the electric charge can appear to change at very short distances due to quantum effects.
  • Several participants express confusion regarding the implications of charge behavior in quantum electrodynamics and the appropriateness of discussing such advanced topics in the current thread.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the initial question of changing charge, with multiple competing views about the nature of antimatter and the behavior of charge at different energy scales. The discussion also reflects uncertainty regarding the implications of quantum electrodynamics.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion regarding the assumptions made about charge constancy and the complexities introduced by quantum electrodynamics. The conversation also touches on the appropriateness of the thread's level for such advanced topics.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those exploring concepts in particle physics, antimatter, and quantum electrodynamics, as well as individuals curious about the historical challenges in understanding particle charge behavior.

Quantum Velocity
Messages
73
Reaction score
6
To make antimatter you have to change the charge of proton and electron. So how do you do it
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can't. The anti-matter particles aren't made out of their corresponding matter-particles. Positrons occur naturally, e.g. in the cosmic radiation and certain decay processes, anti-protons are generated by proton-proton collisions in high energy particle accelerators. The protons aren't changed in anti-protons, the kinetic energy produces them. So there is no change of charge going on here.

Btw., you would probably find a lot of information about these processes on the internet. Wikipedia and the links there might be a good start and will not automatically lead explanations on high level physics.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: bhobba and berkeman
Ok thank you. I haven't explored the problem close enough
 
Just as an added twist the closer you get to an electron the bigger the charge - it depends on the energy scale. It was this that confused the early pioneers and led to infinities and the invention of renormalisation to tame it. The full understanding came with the work of Wilson he got a Nobel for:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Renormalization_group

Thanks
Bill
 
bhobba said:
Just as an added twist the closer you get to an electron the bigger the charge - it depends on the energy scale. It was this that confused the early pioneers and led to infinities and the invention of renormalisation to tame it. The full understanding came with the work of Wilson he got a Nobel for:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Renormalization_group

Thanks
Bill
Hello bhobba. This has confused me. Should we take your first sentence literally? As I understand (understood) it, an electron has a charge which I thought was considered to be a fundamental constant. But in your first sentence you seem to be suggesting its charge is not a constant but somehow increases as something gets closer to it. Does that really happen?
I have looked at the wiki article and have also searched elsewhere but am still none the wiser. Would you be able to clarify the matter please? Thank you.
 
Dadface said:
As I understand (understood) it, an electron has a charge which I thought was considered to be a fundamental constant.
There is a constant, and both classically and (with some corners being cut) in non-relativistic quantum mechanics an electron is an idealized point particle with charge equal to that constant; it's the field strength that becomes infinite as you move arbitrarily close to the electron. It gets much messier in quantum electrodynamics, and that's what Bhobba is talking about.

I'm not sure that a B-level thread is the right place to carry on this discussion; we've already come close to hijacking the original thread.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: bhobba and Dadface
Thanks for clearing that up Nugatory.:smile:
 
Nugatory said:
I'm not sure that a B-level thread is the right place to carry on this discussion; we've already come close to hijacking the original thread.

Yes - not really appropriate at the B level - I just mentioned it as an aside, bot probably shouldn't have :cry::cry::cry::cry::cry::cry::cry:

Start a new thread about renormalisation and the Landau pole if interested - but it is A level - although myself and others will try and make it understandable at lower levels if you mention it in the post.

Thanks
Bill
 
Dadface said:
I have looked at the wiki article and have also searched elsewhere but am still none the wiser. Would you be able to clarify the matter please? Thank you.

This is the relevant bit in the above article in case you missed it:

For example, in quantum electrodynamics (QED), an electron appears to be composed of electrons, positrons (anti-electrons) and photons, as one views it at higher resolution, at very short distances. The electron at such short distances has a slightly different electric charge than does the "dressed electron" seen at large distances, and this change, or "running," in the value of the electric charge is determined by the renormalization group equation.

But I just posted it for your interest - it doesn't really belong here.

If anyone wants to chat about it further start a new thread like I said above.

Thanks
Bill
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Dadface

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K