How to choose between two uncertainty calculation method?

Helena17
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hello,
I have made an experimental work and I am ask to provide a formal experimental error analysis. I have a difficulty to choose the appropriate analysis way and would like to have some advices or explanations.
I have measured a temperatures at the intlet (Ti) and outlet (To) of a heat exchanger and the mass flow rate of the fluid. I can calculate the power:
Q = mC (To-Ti)
From what I learn on uncertainty calculations, I am a little bit confused. I finally found that I could calculate my uncertainty in two ways:
(1): \frac{ΔQ}{Q} = \frac{Δm}{m}+ \frac{2ΔT}{To-Ti}

(2): \frac{ΔQ}{Q} =\sqrt{\left(\frac{Δm}{m}\right)^2+\left(\frac{2ΔT}{To-Ti}\right)^2}

Δm: accuracy of the mass flowrate meter (documentation of the supplier)
ΔT: accuracy of the mass flowrate meter (value given by the calibration center)
C is admit as a constant

I made just one measurement. Which one of the above equations must I use and why?

Actually, I derived heat transfer coefficients (built a curve) from several measurements, by changing the flowrate m and the inlet temperature Ti. But no test has been repeated in the same conditions. Is the first method or the second one am I going to use for the "error analysis"?
Thank you in advance.
P.S. Please, even if you do not have a time, even a short answer would be useful for me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Helena17 said:
Hello,
I have made an experimental work and I am ask to provide a formal experimental error analysis. I have a difficulty to choose the appropriate analysis way and would like to have some advices or explanations.
I have measured a temperatures at the intlet (Ti) and outlet (To) of a heat exchanger and the mass flow rate of the fluid. I can calculate the power:
Q = mC (To-Ti)
From what I learn on uncertainty calculations, I am a little bit confused. I finally found that I could calculate my uncertainty in two ways:
(1): \frac{ΔQ}{Q} = \frac{Δm}{m}+ \frac{2ΔT}{To-Ti}

(2): \frac{ΔQ}{Q} =\sqrt{\left(\frac{Δm}{m}\right)^2+\left(\frac{2ΔT}{To-Ti}\right)^2}

Δm: accuracy of the mass flowrate meter (documentation of the supplier)
ΔT: accuracy of the mass flowrate meter (value given by the calibration center)
C is admit as a constant

I made just one measurement. Which one of the above equations must I use and why?

Actually, I derived heat transfer coefficients (built a curve) from several measurements, by changing the flowrate m and the inlet temperature Ti. But no test has been repeated in the same conditions. Is the first method or the second one am I going to use for the "error analysis"?
Thank you in advance.
P.S. Please, even if you do not have a time, even a short answer would be useful for me.


If the two accuracies are independent and the numbers you have giving us are standard deviations then use equation 2. The reason is that independent errors tend to cancel to some degree, so to "add" them correctly one must use the formula you show there.
 
Thank you ImaLooser for your explanation. I assume that the accuracies are independant. But I don't know if the accuracy of the intruments are standard deviation (I always think that they are the maximal error; I may be wrong). Actually, for a long time, I do not realize that the accuracy of an instrument can be given as a standard deviation. So, in case, it is the maximal error, should I keep equation (2)?
Thank you.
 
Helena17 said:
Thank you ImaLooser for your explanation. I assume that the accuracies are independant. But I don't know if the accuracy of the intruments are standard deviation (I always think that they are the maximal error; I may be wrong). Actually, for a long time, I do not realize that the accuracy of an instrument can be given as a standard deviation. So, in case, it is the maximal error, should I keep equation (2)?
Thank you.

If it is standard deviation then use 2. If it is systematic error, then use 1.

Systematic error is repeatable error. The system always gives exactly the same answer, but the answer is inaccurate in the same way every time.

If it is some unknown kind of error, then use 1. It will always be greater than 2, so you are playing it safe.
 
Thank you very much. I understand now the difference.
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
30
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
2K
Back
Top