How to Compute Eigenvalues Using the QR Algorithm?

svishal03
Messages
124
Reaction score
1
I'm attempting to write a code for computing the Eigen values of a real symmetric matrix and I'm using the QR algorithm.I'm referring wiki,Numerical Recipees book and other web serach articles.

This is a part of the self-study course I'm doing in Linear Algebra to upgrde my skills.

My aim is not only getting the algorithm but also understanding Linear algebra and this site is a great help.

As I conclude, following algorithm is being planned by me for implemantation:

1. First and foremost carry out Householder transformation to obtain a tridiagonal matrix from (n-2) householder iterations where n is the size of the square symmetric matrix.

2. During each of the above n-2 iterations, we have Q1,Q2,Q3…..Q(n-2) Householdr matrices


3. We can now obtain Q and R (of QR factorization) where Q is an orthogonal matrix and R is an upper triangular matrix

4. R = Qn-2* Qn-1*……….*Q2*Q1

5. Q = Q1*Q2*………*Qn-2

6. Thus we decompose the original matrix A into A = QR

Am I right above?

I'm not very clear how to get Eigen values following this.Can anyone site a good refernce?

Vishal
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Please can anyone help, it is very urgent..
 
Thread 'Determine whether ##125## is a unit in ##\mathbb{Z_471}##'
This is the question, I understand the concept, in ##\mathbb{Z_n}## an element is a is a unit if and only if gcd( a,n) =1. My understanding of backwards substitution, ... i have using Euclidean algorithm, ##471 = 3⋅121 + 108## ##121 = 1⋅108 + 13## ##108 =8⋅13+4## ##13=3⋅4+1## ##4=4⋅1+0## using back-substitution, ##1=13-3⋅4## ##=(121-1⋅108)-3(108-8⋅13)## ... ##= 121-(471-3⋅121)-3⋅471+9⋅121+24⋅121-24(471-3⋅121## ##=121-471+3⋅121-3⋅471+9⋅121+24⋅121-24⋅471+72⋅121##...
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
4K
2
Replies
86
Views
22K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Back
Top